Process evaluations of the 5-a-Day projects

被引:193
作者
Baranowski, T [1 ]
Stables, G
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Childrens Nutr Res Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] NCI, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/109019810002700202
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Process evaluation is an important, but infrequently conducted, component of evaluating the impact of health promotion interventions. The process evaluation results from the nine 5-a-Day projects were overviewed. Process evaluation helped explain some of the weaker aspects of program performance, process indicators occasionally declined over time and varied by demographic characteristics, and some process measures were related to mediating variables and program outcomes. Future development of process evaluation must include further development of concepts, more consistent and thorough conduct of process evaluation, appropriate methodological work, and assessment of the relations among the process evaluation components and the program mediators and outcomes. Further development in this area promises refinement in understanding how and why interventions achieve their effects, how best to conduct intervention programs to maximize effects, and enhancement of the internal and external validity of the studies.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 166
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ADV HLTH ED PROMOT
  • [2] Theory as mediating variables: Why aren't community interventions working as desired?
    Baranowski, T
    Lin, LS
    Wetter, DW
    Resnicow, K
    Hearn, MD
    [J]. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (07) : S89 - S95
  • [3] Seattle 5-a-Day Work-Site Project: Process evaluation
    Beresford, SAA
    Shannon, J
    McLerran, D
    Thompson, B
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2000, 27 (02) : 213 - 222
  • [4] Implementing a 5-a-Day peer health educator program for public sector labor and trades employees
    Buller, D
    Buller, MK
    Larkey, L
    Sennott-Miller, L
    Taren, D
    Aickin, M
    Wentzel, TM
    Morrill, C
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2000, 27 (02) : 232 - 240
  • [5] The North Carolina Black Churches United for Better Health Project: Intervention and process evaluation
    Campbell, MK
    Motsinger, BM
    Ingram, A
    Jewell, D
    Makarushka, C
    Beatty, B
    Dodds, J
    McClelland, J
    Demissie, S
    Demark-Wahnefried, W
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2000, 27 (02) : 241 - 253
  • [6] Cook ThomasD., 1979, Quasi-experimentation: Design analysis issues for field settings
  • [7] Gimme 5 fruit and vegetables for fun and health: Process evaluation
    Davis, M
    Baranowski, T
    Resnicow, K
    Baranowski, J
    Doyle, C
    Smith, M
    Wang, DQT
    Yaroch, A
    Hebert, D
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2000, 27 (02) : 167 - 176
  • [8] FORMATIVE AND PROCESS EVALUATION OF HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION PROGRAMS
    DEHAR, MA
    CASSWELL, S
    DUIGNAN, P
    [J]. EVALUATION REVIEW, 1993, 17 (02) : 204 - 220
  • [9] 5 A DAY FOR BETTER HEALTH - A NEW RESEARCH INITIATIVE
    HAVAS, S
    HEIMENDINGER, J
    REYNOLDS, K
    BARANOWSKI, T
    NICKLAS, TA
    BISHOP, D
    BULLER, D
    SORENSEN, G
    BERESFORD, SAA
    COWAN, A
    DAMRON, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 1994, 94 (01) : 32 - 36
  • [10] Uses of process evaluation in the Maryland WIC 5-a-Day Promotion Program
    Havas, S
    Anliker, J
    Damron, D
    Feldman, R
    Langenberg, P
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2000, 27 (02) : 254 - 263