Memoryless Techniques and Wireless Technologies for Indoor Localization With the Internet of Things

被引:89
作者
Sadowski, Sebastian [1 ]
Spachos, Petros [1 ]
Plataniotis, Konstantinos N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Sch Engn, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Toronto, ON M5S 3G4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Bluetooth low energy (BLE); indoor localization; K-nearest neighbor (KNN); location-based services (LBSs); Naive Bayes; smart buildings; trilateration; WiFi; ZigBee; CSI;
D O I
10.1109/JIOT.2020.2992651
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In recent years, the Internet of Things (IoT) has grown to include the tracking of devices through the use of indoor positioning systems (IPSs) and location-based services (LBSs). When designing an IPS, a popular approach involves using wireless networks to calculate the approximate location of the target from devices with predetermined positions. In many smart building applications, LBS is necessary for efficient workspaces to be developed. In this article, we examine two memoryless positioning techniques, K-nearest neighbor (KNN) and Naive Bayes, and compare them with simple trilateration, in terms of accuracy, precision, and complexity. We present a comprehensive analysis between the techniques through the use of three popular IoT wireless technologies: 1) ZigBee; 2) Bluetooth low energy (BLE); and 3) WiFi (2.4-GHz band), along with three experimental scenarios to verify results across multiple environments. According to experimental results, KNN is the most accurate localization technique as well as the most precise. The received signal strength indicator data set of all the experiments is available online.
引用
收藏
页码:10996 / 11005
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   RSSI-Based Distributed Self-Localization for Wireless Sensor Networks Used in Precision Agriculture [J].
Abouzar, Pooyan ;
Michelson, David G. ;
Hamdi, Maziyar .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 15 (10) :6638-6650
[2]  
Ahmad T, 2016, I C COMM SOFTW NET, P455, DOI 10.1109/ICCSN.2016.7587200
[3]  
Amirisoori S, 2017, INT J FUTUR GENER CO, V10, P23, DOI 10.14257/ijfgcn.2017.10.9.03
[4]  
Boers NM, 2016, 2016 IEEE 21ST INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON COMPUTER AIDED MODELLING AND DESIGN OF COMMUNICATION LINKS AND NETWORKS (CAMAD), P101, DOI 10.1109/CAMAD.2016.7790338
[5]  
Boonsriwai S, 2013, 2013 10 INT C EL, P1
[6]   Ranging RFID Tags With Ultrasound [J].
Carotenuto, Riccardo ;
Merenda, Massimo ;
Iero, Demetrio ;
Della Corte, Francesco G. .
IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (07) :2967-2975
[7]   Multi-layer neural network for received signal strength-based indoor localisation [J].
Dai, Huan ;
Ying, Wen-hao ;
Xu, Jiang .
IET COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 10 (06) :717-723
[8]  
Ge XB, 2016, INT CONF SOFTW ENG, P135, DOI 10.1109/ICSESS.2016.7883033
[9]  
Grossmann U, 2007, INT WORKSH INT DATA, P653
[10]   Wi-Fi Fingerprint-Based Indoor Positioning: Recent Advances and Comparisons [J].
He, Suining ;
Chan, S. -H. Gary .
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2016, 18 (01) :466-490