Resiliency Policies in Access Control

被引:15
作者
Li, Ninghui [1 ]
Wang, Qihua [1 ]
Tripunitara, Mahesh
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Security; Theory; Access control; fault-tolerant; policy design; PROTECTION;
D O I
10.1145/1513601.1513602
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We introduce the notion of resiliency policies in the context of access control systems. Such policies require an access control system to be resilient to the absence of users. An example resiliency policy requires that upon removal of any s users, there should still exist d disjoint sets of users such that the users in each set together possess certain permissions of interest. Such a policy ensures that even when emergency situations cause some users to be absent, there still exist independent teams of users that have the permissions necessary for carrying out critical tasks. The Resiliency Checking Problem determines whether an access control state satisfies a given resiliency policy. We show that the general case of the problem and several subcases are intractable (NP-hard), and identify two subcases that are solvable in linear time. For the intractable cases, we also identify the complexity class in the polynomial hierarchy to which these problems belong. We discuss the design and evaluation of an algorithm that can efficiently solve instances of nontrivial sizes that belong to the intractable cases of the problem. Furthermore, we study the consistency problem between resiliency policies and static separation of duty policies. Finally, we combine the notions of resiliency and separation of duty to introduce the resilient separation of duty policy, which is useful in situations where both fault-tolerance and fraud-prevention are desired.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Ahn G.-J., 2000, ACM Transactions on Information and Systems Security, V3, P207, DOI 10.1145/382912.382913
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1979, Computers and Intractablity: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness
  • [3] Clark D. D., 1987, Proceedings of the 1987 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Cat. No.87CH2416-6), P184
  • [4] Crampton J., 2003, P 8 ACM S ACCESS CON, P43
  • [5] DU D, 1997, DIMACS SERIES DISCRE, V35
  • [6] On the formal definition of separation-of-duty policies and their composition
    Gligor, VD
    Gavrila, SI
    Ferraiolo, D
    [J]. 1998 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY - PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 172 - 183
  • [7] Graham G.S., 1972, P AFIPS SPRING JOINT, V40, P417
  • [8] PROTECTION IN OPERATING-SYSTEMS
    HARRISON, MA
    RUZZO, WL
    ULLMAN, JD
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1976, 19 (08) : 461 - 470
  • [9] Jaeger T., 2001, ACM Transactions on Information and Systems Security, V4, P158, DOI 10.1145/501963.501966
  • [10] Koch M, 2002, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2502, P229