Comparative analysis between a complete LCA study and results from a BIM-LCA plug-in

被引:95
作者
Bueno, Cristiane [1 ]
Fabricio, Marcio Minto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Civil Engn Dept, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Architecture & Urbanism Inst, Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Environmental assessment of buildings; Life cycle assessment; Building information modelling; BIM-LCA integration tools; DESIGN; STAGE; SUSTAINABILITY; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.028
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Early and precise decisions can help the process of sustainable design to become much more efficient and cost-effective. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) enables a scientific assessment, which facilitates locating possible changes associated with different stages of the cycle which results in improvements in its environmental profile. Although LCA is increasingly present in the demands of the building sector, professionals continue to seek new ways to incorporate such a methodology into the building design and construction processes as seamlessly and straightforwardly as possible. A promising possibility is the integration of building components LCA data in the Building Information Modelling (BIM) platform. This paper discusses the consequences of the simplifications of LCA data and methodology in the main existing tools that integrates LCA in the BIM platform using a simulation on wall systems performed in a BIM plug-in. The consistency of the results is compared to a full WA on Gabi 6 software. The results were not consistent, despite the research efforts towards equalizing the scope of the studies to provide a fair comparison. The reasons are probably the simplifications and shortcuts necessary for developing a simpler BIM-based tool to be applied during the design process, by any building designer with no particular expertise in LCA.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 200
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Ajayi e.a., 2015, INT J SUSTAINABLE BU, V6, P14
  • [2] Alawini A., 2013, RES TECHNOLOGY MANAG
  • [3] Azhar S., 2009, International Journal of Construction Education and Research, V5, P276, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15578770903355657, https://doi.org/10.1080/15578770903355657]
  • [4] Building information modeling for sustainable design and LEED® rating analysis
    Azhar, Salman
    Carlton, Wade A.
    Olsen, Darren
    Ahmad, Irtishad
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 20 (02) : 217 - 224
  • [5] BARE JC, 2003, J IND ECOLOGY, V0006
  • [6] Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts
    Basbagill, J.
    Flager, F.
    Lepech, M.
    Fischer, M.
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 60 : 81 - 92
  • [7] Sixty years of Operational Research
    Bowen, K
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 153 (03) : 618 - 623
  • [8] Sensitivity analysis of the use of Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods: a case study on building materials
    Bueno, Cristiane
    Hauschild, Michael Zwicky
    Rossignolo, Joao Adriano
    Ometto, Aldo Roberto
    Mendes, Natalia Crespo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 2208 - 2220
  • [9] Bueno Cristiane., 2016, P S REV PROGRAMA P S, V23, DOI DOI 10.11606/ISSN.2317-2762.V23I40P96-121
  • [10] EC-JRC European Commission: Joint Research Centre, 2010, INT REF LIF CYCL DAT