Prostate cancer: Detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging

被引:135
|
作者
Mullerad, M
Hricak, H
Wang, L
Chen, HN
Kattan, MW
Scardino, PT
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
diagnostic radiology; observer performance; magnetic resonance (MR); coils; spectroscopy; prostate; biopsy; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2321031254
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine whether predictive value of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings in detection of prostate cancer extracapsular extension (ECE) is significantly affected by the reader's subspecialty experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cohort study, 344 consecutive patients with biopsy-proved prostate cancer underwent endorectal MR imaging followed by surgery. Likelihood of ECE described in MR imaging reports was compared with clinical predictor variables. ECE was determined from the final pathologic report on specimens resected at surgery. Readers of MR images were classified into genitourinary MR imaging radiologists (n = 4) and general body MR imaging radiologists (n = 6). For data analysis, Wilcoxon rank sum and chi(2) tests, as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, were used. A difference with P <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Univariate analysis results demonstrated that all predictors except clinical stage were significantly associated with detection of ECE in both groups of readers (P <.05). In the genitourinary MR imaging radiologist group of patients, area under the ROC curve for endorectal MR imaging findings (0.833) was larger than areas under the curves for all other predictors (0.566-0.701). In the general body MR imaging radiologist group of patients, area under the ROC curve for endorectal MR imaging findings (0.646) was not larger than areas under the curves for all other predictors (0.582-0.793). Results of multivariate analysis of two models, one with all predictors and another with all predictors except endorectal MR imaging findings, demonstrated a significant increase in area under the ROC curve with endorectal MR images interpreted by genitourinary MR imaging radiologists (P =.019 and.31, respectively). CONCLUSION: Endorectal MR imaging findings are significant predictors for detection of ECE when MR images are interpreted by genitourinary radiologists experienced with MR imaging of the prostate.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 146
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prostate cancer staging with extracapsular extension risk scoring using multiparametric MRI: a correlation with histopathology
    Boesen, Lars
    Chabanova, Elizaveta
    Logager, Vibeke
    Balslev, Ingegerd
    Mikines, Kari
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (06) : 1776 - 1785
  • [32] Inter-Reader Agreement of Multi-Parametric MR Imaging for the Detection of Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of a Scoring System
    Quentin, M.
    Arsov, C.
    Roehlen, S.
    Klasen, J.
    Antoch, G.
    Albers, P.
    Blondin, D.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2012, 184 (10): : 925 - 929
  • [33] MR Imaging for Prostate Cancer Screening and Active Surveillance
    Druskin, Sasha C.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 56 (02) : 251 - +
  • [34] Localizing prostate cancer in the presence of postbiopsy changes on MR images: Role of proton MR spectroscopic imaging
    Kaji, Y
    Kurhanewicz, J
    Hricak, H
    Sokolov, DL
    Huang, LR
    Nelson, SJ
    Vigneron, DB
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 206 (03) : 785 - 790
  • [35] Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance: Role of Anatomic MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopic Imaging
    Fradet, Vincent
    Kurhanewicz, John
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Karl, Alexander
    Coakley, Fergus V.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Carroll, Peter R.
    RADIOLOGY, 2010, 256 (01) : 176 - 183
  • [36] Prostate Cancer: Value of Multiparametric MR Imaging at 3 T for Detection-Histopathologic Correlation
    Turkbey, Baris
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Mani, Haresh
    Bernardo, Marcelino
    Pang, Yuxi
    McKinney, Yolanda L.
    Khurana, Kiranpreet
    Ravizzini, Gregory C.
    Albert, Paul S.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    RADIOLOGY, 2010, 255 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [37] Prostate cancer staging: Should MR imaging be used? - A decision analytic approach
    Jager, GJ
    Severens, JL
    Thornbury, JR
    de la Rosette, JJMCH
    Ruijs, SHJ
    Barentsz, JO
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) : 445 - 451
  • [38] Elastography in prostate gland imaging and prostate cancer detection
    Tyloch, Dominik
    Tyloch, Janusz
    Adamowicz, Jan
    Juszczak, Kajetan
    Ostrowski, Adam
    Warsinski, Patryk
    Wilamowski, Jacek
    Ludwikowska, Joanna
    Drewa, Tomasz
    MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2018, 20 (04) : 515 - 523
  • [39] Machine learning in predicting extracapsular extension (ECE) of prostate cancer with MRI: a protocol for a systematic literature review
    Guerra, Adalgisa
    Negrao, Eduardo
    Papanikolaou, Nickolas
    Donato, Helena
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [40] MR-perfusion (MRP) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in prostate cancer: Quantitative and model-based gadobenate dimeglumine MRP parameters in detection of prostate cancer
    Scherr, M. K.
    Seitz, M.
    Mueller-Lisse, U. G.
    Ingrisch, M.
    Reiser, M. F.
    Mueller-Lisse, U. L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 76 (03) : 359 - 366