Prostate cancer: Detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging

被引:135
|
作者
Mullerad, M
Hricak, H
Wang, L
Chen, HN
Kattan, MW
Scardino, PT
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
diagnostic radiology; observer performance; magnetic resonance (MR); coils; spectroscopy; prostate; biopsy; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2321031254
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine whether predictive value of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings in detection of prostate cancer extracapsular extension (ECE) is significantly affected by the reader's subspecialty experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cohort study, 344 consecutive patients with biopsy-proved prostate cancer underwent endorectal MR imaging followed by surgery. Likelihood of ECE described in MR imaging reports was compared with clinical predictor variables. ECE was determined from the final pathologic report on specimens resected at surgery. Readers of MR images were classified into genitourinary MR imaging radiologists (n = 4) and general body MR imaging radiologists (n = 6). For data analysis, Wilcoxon rank sum and chi(2) tests, as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, were used. A difference with P <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Univariate analysis results demonstrated that all predictors except clinical stage were significantly associated with detection of ECE in both groups of readers (P <.05). In the genitourinary MR imaging radiologist group of patients, area under the ROC curve for endorectal MR imaging findings (0.833) was larger than areas under the curves for all other predictors (0.566-0.701). In the general body MR imaging radiologist group of patients, area under the ROC curve for endorectal MR imaging findings (0.646) was not larger than areas under the curves for all other predictors (0.582-0.793). Results of multivariate analysis of two models, one with all predictors and another with all predictors except endorectal MR imaging findings, demonstrated a significant increase in area under the ROC curve with endorectal MR images interpreted by genitourinary MR imaging radiologists (P =.019 and.31, respectively). CONCLUSION: Endorectal MR imaging findings are significant predictors for detection of ECE when MR images are interpreted by genitourinary radiologists experienced with MR imaging of the prostate.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 146
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Independent external validation of nomogram to predict extracapsular extension in patients with prostate cancer
    Alves, Joao Ricardo
    Muglia, Valdair F.
    Lucchesi, Fabiano R.
    Faria, Raisa A. O. G.
    Alcantara-Quispe, Cinthia
    Vazquez, Vinicius L.
    Reis, Rodolfo B.
    Faria, Eliney F.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (09) : 5004 - 5010
  • [22] Prostate cancer tumor volume: Measurement with endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging
    Coakley, FV
    Kurhanewicz, J
    Lu, Y
    Jones, KD
    Swanson, MG
    Chang, SD
    Carroll, PR
    Hricak, H
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (01) : 91 - 97
  • [23] External validation of a magnetic resonance imaging-based algorithm for prediction of side-specific extracapsular extension in prostate cancer
    Zapala, Piotr
    Kozikowski, Mieszko
    Dybowski, Bartosz
    Zapala, Lukasz
    Dobruch, Jakub
    Radziszewski, Piotr
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 74 (03) : 327 - 333
  • [24] Predicting prostate cancer with dynamic endorectal coil MR and proton spectroscopic MR imaging
    Portalez, D
    Malavaud, B
    Herigault, G
    Lhez, JM
    Elman, B
    Jonca, F
    Besse, J
    Pradere, M
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2004, 85 (12): : 1999 - 2004
  • [25] Role of imaging in detection and staging of prostate cancer
    Cornud, F
    Oyen, R
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2002, 83 (06): : 863 - 882
  • [26] MR spectroscopic imaging for evaluation of prostate cancer
    Taouli, B
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2006, 87 (02): : 222 - 227
  • [27] Prostate cancer: Localization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging - Clinicopathologic study
    Scheidler, J
    Hricak, H
    Vigneron, DB
    Yu, KK
    Sokolov, DL
    Huang, LR
    Zaloudek, CJ
    Nelson, SJ
    Carroll, PR
    Kurhanewicz, J
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (02) : 473 - 480
  • [28] Comparison between biparametric and multiparametric MR imaging of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 in detection of prostate cancer
    EL-Adalany, Mohamed Ali
    Abd EL-Razek, Ahmed Abd E. L-khalek
    EL-Diasty, Tarek
    EL-Hendy, Ahmed
    EL-Metwally, Dina
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 52 (01)
  • [29] Comparison between biparametric and multiparametric MR imaging of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 in detection of prostate cancer
    Mohamed Ali EL-Adalany
    Ahmed Abd E L-khalek Abd EL-Razek
    Tarek EL-Diasty
    Ahmed EL-Hendy
    Dina EL-Metwally
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 52
  • [30] Clinicopathologic analysis of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: Should the clinical target volume be expanded posterolaterally to account for microscopic extension?
    Chao, K. Kenneth
    Goldstein, Neal S.
    Yan, Di
    Vargas, Carlos E.
    Ghilezan, Michel I.
    Korman, Howard J.
    Kernen, Kenneth M.
    Hollander, Jay B.
    Gonzalez, Jose A.
    Martinez, Alvaro A.
    Vicini, Frank A.
    Kestin, Larry L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (04): : 999 - 1007