Comparison of five stochastic weather generators in simulating daily precipitation and temperature for the Loess Plateau of China

被引:71
作者
Chen, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Brissette, Francois P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, State Key Lab Soil Eros & Dryland Farming Loess P, Yangling, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Quebec, Ecole Technol Super, Dept Construct Engn, Montreal, PQ H3C 1K3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
stochastic weather generator; precipitation; temperature; Markov chain; distribution; LOW-FREQUENCY VARIABILITY; PRESERVING LOW-FREQUENCY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY; LARS-WG; AAFC-WG; PARAMETERS; MODEL; IMPROVEMENT; EROSION;
D O I
10.1002/joc.3896
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Stochastic weather generators are computer models used to simulate synthetic weather time series based on statistical characteristics of observed weather time series for a location of interest. The performance of weather generators should always be evaluated when applied over a new region, especially in a different climate zone. The Loess Plateau of China suffers from extensive soil erosion problems, mostly resulting from extreme precipitation events in an otherwise dry climate. The generation of accurate synthetic climate data (including the extremes) is the key to adequately assess the effect of soil and water conservation measures, especially in a changing climate. Accordingly, this work compares the ability of five commonly used stochastic weather generators (WGEN, CLIMGEN, CLIGEN, WeaGETS and LARSWG) to simulate daily precipitation and temperature for the Loess Plateau. The results show that the first-order Markov chain-based model satisfactorily simulates the precipitation occurrence, even though slightly better results can be achieved by using the second-and third-order Markov chain-based models. The semi-empirical distribution-based model shows a slightly better performance than the higher-order Markov chain-based models at generating dry spells, while it gives a worse performance in generating wet spells. The semi-empirical distribution-based LARSWG is consistently better than the parametric distribution-based weather generators at simulating daily precipitation amounts, and the three-parameter distribution-based models are consistently better than two-parameter distribution-based models, especially for generating extreme precipitation events. Overall, the performance of WeaGETS is generally superior to that of the other weather generators; it can be used for simulating daily precipitation, T-max and T-min for the Loess Plateau. While CLIGEN is not consistently a top performer, its reasonable representation of extreme precipitation events makes it suitable for soil erosion studies.
引用
收藏
页码:3089 / 3105
页数:17
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PRACTICAL NONPARAMET
[2]   SOME REMARKS ON USE OF DAILY RAINFALL MODELS [J].
BUISHAND, TA .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1978, 36 (3-4) :295-308
[3]  
Chen J, 2008, T ASABE, V51, P901, DOI 10.13031/2013.24529
[4]  
Chen J, 2012, T ASABE, V55, P895
[5]  
Chen J, 2011, T ASABE, V54, P1627, DOI 10.13031/2013.39851
[6]  
Chen J., 2009, SCISOIL WATER CONSER, V7, P27
[7]   Stochastic generation of daily precipitation amounts: review and evaluation of different models [J].
Chen, Jie ;
Brissette, Francois P. .
CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2014, 59 (03) :189-U45
[8]   Assessing scale effects for statistically downscaling precipitation with GPCC model [J].
Chen, Jie ;
Zhang, Xunchang J. ;
Brissette, Francois P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2014, 34 (03) :708-727
[9]   Downscaling of weather generator parameters to quantify hydrological impacts of climate change [J].
Chen, Jie ;
Brissette, Francois P. ;
Leconte, Robert .
CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2012, 51 (03) :185-200
[10]   A daily stochastic weather generator for preserving low-frequency of climate variability [J].
Chen, Jie ;
Brissette, Francois P. ;
Leconte, Robert .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2010, 388 (3-4) :480-490