Establishing Language Benchmarks for Children With Typically Developing Language and Children With Language Impairment

被引:22
作者
Schmitt, Mary Beth [1 ]
Logan, Jessica A. R. [2 ]
Tambyraja, Sherine R. [2 ]
Farquharson, Kelly [3 ]
Justice, Laura M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Crane Ctr Early Childhood Res & Policy, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Emerson Coll, Boston, MA 02116 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2017年 / 60卷 / 02期
关键词
EMPIRICAL BENCHMARKS; EFFECT SIZE; SPEECH; INTERVENTION; KINDERGARTEN; SELECTION; DISORDER; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0273
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Practitioners, researchers, and policymakers (i.e., stakeholders) have vested interests in children's language growth yet currently do not have empirically driven methods for measuring such outcomes. The present study established language benchmarks for children with typically developing language (TDL) and children with language impairment (LI) from 3 to 9 years of age. Method: Effect sizes for grammar, vocabulary, and overall language were calculated for children with TDL (n = 20,018) using raw score means and standard deviations from 8 norm-referenced measures of language. Effect sizes for children with LI were calculated using fall and spring norm-referenced language measures for 497 children with LI receiving business-as-usual therapy in the public schools. Results: Considerable variability was found in expected change across both samples of children over time, with preschoolers exhibiting larger effect sizes (d = 0.82 and 0.70, respectively) compared with school-age children (d = 0.49 and 0.55, respectively). Conclusions: This study provides a first step toward establishing empirically based language benchmarks for children. These data offer stakeholders an initial tool for setting goals based on expected growth (practitioners), making informed decisions on language-based curricula (policymakers), and measuring effectiveness of intervention research (researchers).
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 378
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   The language factor in mathematics tests [J].
Abedi, J ;
Lord, C .
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 2001, 14 (03) :219-234
[2]   Statistical Power Analysis in Psychological Research [J].
Abraham, W. Todd ;
Russell, Daniel W. .
SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2008, 2 (01) :283-301
[3]  
Adams MarilynJager., 2010, American Educator, V34, P3
[4]   Checks and balances: Keeping the science in our profession [J].
Apel, K .
LANGUAGE SPEECH AND HEARING SERVICES IN SCHOOLS, 1999, 30 (01) :98-107
[5]  
Bain B.A., 1991, LANGUAGE SPEECH HEAR, V22, P264, DOI DOI 10.1044/0161-1461.2204.264
[6]   Implementing the mandate: the limitations of benchmark tests [J].
Bancroft, Kim .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2010, 22 (01) :53-72
[7]   Factors Influencing the Selection of Standardized Tests for the Diagnosis of Specific Language Impairment [J].
Betz, Stacy K. ;
Eickhoff, Jessica R. ;
Sullivan, Shanleigh F. .
LANGUAGE SPEECH AND HEARING SERVICES IN SCHOOLS, 2013, 44 (02) :133-146
[8]   LANGUAGE-IMPAIRED 4-YEAR-OLDS - DISTINGUISHING TRANSIENT FROM PERSISTENT IMPAIRMENT [J].
BISHOP, DVM ;
EDMUNDSON, A .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1987, 52 (02) :156-173
[9]  
Bloom H.S., 2008, J RES EDUC EFF, V1, P289, DOI [DOI 10.1080/19345740802400072, 10.1080/19345740802400072]
[10]  
Bloom L., 1978, LANGUAGE DEV LANGUAG