Portfolio optimization under convex incentive schemes

被引:21
作者
Bichuch, Maxim [1 ]
Sturm, Stephan [1 ]
机构
[1] Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Math Sci, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Portfolio optimization; Fund manager's problem; Incentive scheme; Convex duality; Delegated portfolio management; OPTIMAL INVESTMENT; UTILITY MAXIMIZATION; DUAL FORMULATION; COMPENSATION; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00780-014-0236-9
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We consider the terminal wealth utility maximization problem from the point of view of a portfolio manager who is paid by an incentive scheme, which is given as a convex function g of the terminal wealth. The manager's own utility function U is assumed to be smooth and strictly concave; however, the resulting utility function Ua similar to g fails to be concave. As a consequence, the problem considered here does not fit into the classical portfolio optimization theory. Using duality theory, we prove wealth-independent existence and uniqueness of the optimal portfolio in general (incomplete) semimartingale markets as long as the unique optimizer of the dual problem has a continuous law. In many cases, this existence and uniqueness result is independent of the incentive scheme and depends only on the structure of the set of equivalent local martingale measures. As examples, we discuss (complete) one-dimensional models as well as (incomplete) lognormal mixture and popular stochastic volatility models. We also provide a detailed analysis of the case where the unique optimizer of the dual problem does not have a continuous law, leading to optimization problems whose solvability by duality methods depends on the initial wealth of the investor.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 915
页数:43
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Malliavin differentiability of the Heston volatility and applications to option pricing [J].
Alos, Elisa ;
Ewald, Christian-Oliver .
ADVANCES IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2008, 40 (01) :144-162
[2]   Martingale representation theorems for initially enlarged filtrations [J].
Amendinger, J .
STOCHASTIC PROCESSES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 2000, 89 (01) :101-116
[3]  
Bogachev V. I., 2007, MEASURE THEORY, V2, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-34514-5
[4]  
Bogachev VI., 2007, MEASURE THEORY, VI, II
[5]   Dual formulation of the utility maximization problem: The case of nonsmooth utility [J].
Bouchard, B ;
Touzi, N ;
Zeghal, A .
ANNALS OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2004, 14 (02) :678-717
[6]  
Brannath W, 1999, LECT NOTES MATH, V1709, P349
[7]  
Brigo D., 2006, Interest Rate Models-Theory and Practice
[8]  
Carassus L., 2009, RIMS KOKYUROKU, V1620, P81
[9]   Does option compensation increase managerial risk appetite? [J].
Carpenter, JN .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (05) :2311-2331
[10]  
Deelstra G, 2001, ANN APPL PROBAB, V11, P1353