L1 AND L2 WORD RECOGNITION IN FINNISH Examining L1 Effects on L2 Processing of Morphological Complexity and Morphophonological Transparency

被引:13
作者
Vainio, Seppo [1 ]
Pajunen, Anneli [2 ]
Hyona, Jukka [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland
[2] Univ Tampere, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
关键词
SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT; INFLECTED WORDS; SENTENCE INTERPRETATION; MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURE; AFFIXAL HOMONYMY; LANGUAGE; 2ND-LANGUAGE; FREQUENCY; ENGLISH; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1017/S0272263113000478
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This study investigated the effect of the first language (L1) on the visual word recognition of inflected nouns in second language (L2) Finnish by native Russian and Chinese speakers. Case inflection is common in Russian and in Finnish but nonexistent in Chinese. Several models have been posited to describe L2 morphological processing. The unified competition model (UCM; MacWhinney, 2005) predicts L1-L2 transfer, whereas processability theory (Pienemann, 1998) posits a universal hierarchy in L2 acquisition regardless of the L1. The morphological decomposition deficiency hypothesis (Ullman, 2001b; VanPatten, 2004) claims that nonnatives cannot morphologically decompose words. Finally, DeKeyser (2005) proposes that morphophonological transparency affects nonnative processing. The current study explores which model best accounts for the processing of L2 Finnish by native Russian and Chinese speakers. The materials included simple nouns, transparently inflected nouns, and semitransparently inflected nouns. The results showed that Finns and Russians had longer reaction times (RTs) for morphologically complex nouns, but Chinese had longer RTs for semitransparent nouns. The RT results support the UCM by showing a L1-L2 transfer. Furthermore, transparency influenced word recognition among nonnatives; they made the most errors with semitransparent nouns.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 162
页数:30
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Anneli Pajunen, 2010, VIRITTAJA, V4, P481
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Biling Lang Cogn
[3]  
[Anonymous], E PRIM VERS 1 2
[4]   The role of the second language in third language acquisition: the case of Germanic syntax [J].
Bardel, Camilla ;
Falk, Ylva .
SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH, 2007, 23 (04) :459-484
[5]   Monolingual and bilingual recognition of regular and irregular English verbs: Sensitivity to form similarity varies with first language experience [J].
Basnight-Brown, Dana M. ;
Chen, Lang ;
Hua, Shu ;
Kostic, Aleksandar ;
Feldman, Laurie Beth .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2007, 57 (01) :65-80
[6]   Affixal Homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language [J].
Bertram, R ;
Laine, M ;
Baayen, RH ;
Schreuder, R ;
Hyönä, J .
COGNITION, 2000, 74 (02) :B13-B25
[7]   The interplay of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity in lexical processing: Evidence from a morphologically rich language [J].
Bertram, R ;
Laine, M ;
Karvinen, K .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1999, 28 (03) :213-226
[8]   SYNTACTIC PERSISTENCE IN LANGUAGE PRODUCTION [J].
BOCK, JK .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 18 (03) :355-387
[9]  
Bohnacker U., 2005, SECOND LANG RES, V22, P443
[10]   Verbal Inflectional Morphology in L1 and L2 Spanish: A Frequency Effects Study Examining Storage Versus Composition [J].
Bowden, Harriet Wood ;
Gelfand, Matthew P. ;
Sanz, Cristina ;
Ullman, Michael T. .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2010, 60 (01) :44-87