Differences in Prostate Cancer Grade, Stage, and Location in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens from United States and Japan

被引:25
|
作者
Takahashi, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Epstein, Jonathan I. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wakui, Shin [1 ]
Yamamoto, Toshihiro [5 ]
Furusato, Bungo [1 ]
Zhang, Miao [2 ]
机构
[1] Jikei Univ, Dept Pathol, Sch Med, Tokyo 105, Japan
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[5] Jikei Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
prostatectomy; Gleason grade; tumor stage; tumor location; tumor volume; INTERNATIONAL VARIATION; TRANSITIONAL ZONE; PERIPHERAL ZONES; MORTALITY-RATES; EXPRESSION; BIOPSIES; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1002/pros.22754
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDTo compared prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy between men in the United States (US) and Japan in the modern era. METHODSThree hundred seventy consecutive totally embedded RP cases (159 US; 211 Japan) from 2010 to 2012 were reviewed. RESULTSUS men were significantly younger (mean age 58.8 years) than Japanese men (mean age 64.6 years; P<0.00001). Japanese patients presented with higher PSA levels (mean=10.9ng/ml) compared to US patients (mean=5.8ng/ml, P<0.00001) and higher clinical stage (P=0.003). Japanese tumors were: higher grade; larger; more advanced stage; with increased lymphovascular invasion; and more commonly TZ in location (P<0.00001). In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of high tumor volume were PSA level, clinical stage, TZ location, Gleason grade, and country of origin (Japan). Independent predictors of TZ location were clinical stage, tumor volume, and country of origin (Japan). CONCLUSIONA major factor for larger, higher grade and stage tumors in Japanese patients is the lower prevalence of screening for prostate cancer in Japan. Another contributing factor may be their TZ location, where they are not palpable until advanced and where they are difficult to sample on needle biopsy possibly leading to a delay in diagnosis. The finding of a difference in zonality of prostate cancer between US and Japanese cases is novel and may reflect differences in biology rather than different health care practice between the groups. If this data is confirmed, consideration should be given to TZ sampling as part of routine needle biopsies in Japanese men. Prostate 74:321-325, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 325
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of modified radical prostatectomy technique for recovery of urinary incontinence in high-grade prostate cancer
    Chung, Jae W.
    Kim, Sang W.
    Kang, Ho W.
    Ha, Yun S.
    Choi, Seock H.
    Lee, Jun N.
    Kim, Bum S.
    Kim, Hyun T.
    Kim, Tae H.
    Yoon, Ghil S.
    Kwon, Tae G.
    Chung, Sung K.
    Yoo, Eun S.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2020, 72 (05) : 605 - 614
  • [32] Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer: Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Histologic Grade After Radical Prostatectomy
    Verma, Sadhna
    Rajesh, Arumugam
    Morales, Humberto
    Lemen, Lisa
    Bills, Gordon
    Delworth, Mark
    Gaitonde, Krish
    Ying, Jun
    Samartunga, Ranasinghe
    Lamba, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (02) : 374 - 381
  • [33] A second opinion pathology review improves the diagnostic concordance between prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
    Maehara, Takanori
    Sadahira, Takuya
    Maruyama, Yuki
    Wada, Koichiro
    Araki, Motoo
    Watanabe, Masami
    Watanabe, Toyohiko
    Yanai, Hiroyuki
    Nasu, Yasutomo
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2021, 13 (02) : 119 - 124
  • [34] Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: Comparative studies including radical prostatectomy specimens and template transperineal biopsy
    Toner, Liam
    Weerakoon, Mahesha
    Bolton, Damien M.
    Ryan, Andrew
    Katelaris, Nikolas
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 3 (04) : 107 - 114
  • [35] Stable and discriminating features are predictive of cancer presence and Gleason grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: a multi-site study
    Patrick Leo
    Robin Elliott
    Natalie N. C. Shih
    Sanjay Gupta
    Michael Feldman
    Anant Madabhushi
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [36] Prediction of tumour volume and pathological stage in radical prostatectomy specimens is not improved by taking more prostate needle-biopsy cores
    Grossklaus, DJ
    Coffey, CS
    Shappell, SB
    Jack, GS
    Cookson, MS
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (07) : 722 - 726
  • [37] Prostate biopsy tumor extent but not location predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Results from CAPSURE
    Greene, KL
    Elkin, EP
    Karapetian, A
    DuChane, J
    Carroll, PR
    Kane, CJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (01) : 125 - 129
  • [38] Older Age Predicts Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Grade Reclassification to Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Men on Active Surveillance
    Druskin, Sasha C.
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Trock, Bruce J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (01) : 98 - 104
  • [39] A Case of Polymyalgia Rheumatica Following Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for High-Grade Prostate Cancer
    Deming, Madeleine S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS, 2019, 20 : 474 - 477
  • [40] Circulating Estradiol, But Not Testosterone, Is a Significant Predictor of High-Grade Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Salonia, Andrea
    Gallina, Andrea
    Briganti, Alberto
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Abdollah, Firas
    Bertini, Roberto
    Freschi, Massimo
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    CANCER, 2011, 117 (22) : 5029 - 5038