Feasibility of using the national hospital discharge survey to estimate the prevalence of selected birth defects

被引:17
作者
Boulet, Sheree L.
Correa-Villasenor, Adolfo
Hsia, Jason
Atrash, Hani
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Nalt Ctr Birth Defects & Dev Disabil, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Reprod Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
关键词
birth defects; surveillance; anencephaly; spina bifida; hospital discharge data;
D O I
10.1002/bdra.20291
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Nationally representative data on the prevalence of certain birth defects are largely unavailable. We evaluated the feasibility of using data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) to describe the prevalence of selected birth defects. METHODS: All live births recorded in the NHDS during 1999-2001 were included. The prevalence for selected birth defects was calculated using weighted ratio estimators. Prevalence ratios comparing the NHDS estimates to published national estimates from the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) were calculated. RESULTS: With the exception of common truncus, the NHDS prevalence for the selected defects was consistently lower than the NBDPN estimates. The prevalence ratios ranged from 0.38 for trisomy 18 and anopthalmia/micropthalmia to 1.16 for common truncus. The NHDS, prevalence estimates for spina bifida without anencephaly (PR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.57-1.22) and gastroschisis/omphalocele (PR 0.94, 95% CF: 0.48-1.40) most closely approximated the NBDPN estimates. CONCLUSIONS: NHDS data underestimate the prevalence of most birth defects. Additional research is needed to determine whether NHDS estimates may be useful for evaluating trends in certain conditions. Surveillance systems employing active case-finding continue to provide more accurate estimates of birth defects prevalence. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 76:757-761, 2006. (C) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.*
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 761
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Anderson R.N., 2005, NATL VITAL STAT REPO, V53
[2]   COMPLETENESS OF THE DISCHARGE DIAGNOSES AS A MEASURE OF BIRTH-DEFECTS RECORDED IN THE HOSPITAL BIRTH RECORD [J].
CALLE, EE ;
KHOURY, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 134 (01) :69-77
[3]  
CALLIFDALEY FA, 1995, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V110, P154
[4]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2004, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V53, P362
[5]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2006, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V54, P1301
[6]   Random error and undercounting in birth defects surveillance data:: Implications for inference [J].
Correa-Villaseñor, A ;
Satten, GA ;
Rolka, H ;
Langlois, P ;
Devine, O .
BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART A-CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR TERATOLOGY, 2003, 67 (09) :610-616
[7]   Effect of prenatal diagnosis on epidemiologic studies of birth defects [J].
Cragan, JD ;
Khoury, MJ .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (06) :695-699
[8]   Completeness of state administrative databases for surveillance of congenital heart disease [J].
Cronk, CE ;
Malloy, ME ;
Pelech, AN ;
Miller, RE ;
Meyer, SA ;
Cowell, M ;
McCarver, DG .
BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART A-CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR TERATOLOGY, 2003, 67 (09) :597-603
[9]  
Dennison C, 2000, Vital Health Stat 1, P1
[10]  
Edmonds L D, 1990, MMWR CDC Surveill Summ, V39, P19