Establishing the most appropriate databases for addressing source level propositions

被引：40

作者：

Champod, C

Evett, I

Jackson, G

机构：

[1] Forens Sci Ctr, London SE1 7LP, England

[2] Inst Police Sci & Criminol, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

[3] Forens Sci Serv Inc, Chorley PR7 6HJ, England

来源：

SCIENCE & JUSTICE | 2004年 / 44卷 / 03期

关键词：

forensic science; probability; statistics; likelihood ratio; Bayes; databases; glass; footwear; DNA; drugs;

D O I：

10.1016/S1355-0306(04)71708-6

中图分类号：

DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];

学科分类号：

0301 ; 10 ;

摘要：

Previous papers in Science & Justice have described the work of the Case Assessment and Interpretation (CAI) project that has been running for several years within the Forensic Science Service (FSS). The principles of the CAI model, which have developed through casework, are the foundation of a balanced, robust and logical approach to interpretation. The question arises frequently as to what is the most appropriate database that should be available to assist in assigning a value to a given probability. In this paper we present a set of guidelines in the form of flowcharts and explore them within the context of a range of case examples.

引用

页码：153 / 164

页数：12

共 10 条

[1]

CHAMPOD TH, 2003, THESIS U LAUSANNE

[2] A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework [J].