A techno-economic analysis of thermochemical pathways for corncob-to-energy: Fast pyrolysis to bio-oil, gasification to methanol and combustion to electricity

被引:64
作者
Brigagao, George Victor [1 ]
Fernandes Araujo, Ofelia de Queiroz [1 ]
de Medeiros, Jose Luiz [1 ]
Mikulcic, Hrvoje [2 ]
Duic, Neven [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Escola Quim, CT, Ilha Fundao, BR-21941909 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Zagreb, Fac Mech Engn & Naval Architecture, Dept Energy Power Engn & Environm, Luciceva 5, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
关键词
Corncob; Thermochemical conversion; Biomass pyrolysis; Biomass gasification; Methanol synthesis; Cogeneration; BIOMASS; PERFORMANCE; CONVERSION; HYDROGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.05.011
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Global warming concerns have driven developments in carbon neutral energy, pulling initiatives on biofuels production. However, the low bulk density and low specific energy of biomass refrain its widespread use due to logistic costs comprising harvesting and collection, storage, pretreatments and transportation. This work approaches increasing land energy productivity by thermochemical conversion of residual biomass to energy products, identifying the best options in terms of energy efficiency and economic indicators. Techno-economic performance of three corncob-to-energy pathways is investigated: gasification to methanol, fast pyrolysis to bio-oil and combustion to electricity. Fast pyrolysis allows higher energy recovery in its products (79%) than biomass gasification to methanol (53%), with biomass densification (volume reduction) of 72.7% and 86.2%, respectively. The combustion route presents net efficiency of 30.2% of biomass low heating value (LHV). All alternatives are economically feasible provided biomass cost is lower than US$75.5/t. The minimum allowable product prices for economic attractiveness of gasification, combustion and pyrolysis routes are US$305/t methanol, US$80.1/MWh electricity and US$1.47/gasoline-gallon-equivalent bio-oil. Despite its vulnerability to price volatility, gasification presents the highest net present value, seconded by the combustion route, which has lower medium-term payback and investment than gasification due to its process simplicity.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 113
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Gasification performance of Spirulina microalgae - A thermodynamic study with tar formation
    Adnan, Muflih A.
    Xiong, Qingang
    Hidayat, Arif
    Hossain, Mohammad M.
    [J]. FUEL, 2019, 241 : 372 - 381
  • [2] Review on biofuel oil and gas production processes from microalgae
    Amin, Sarmidi
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 50 (07) : 1834 - 1840
  • [3] Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways
    Anex, Robert P.
    Aden, Andy
    Kazi, Feroz Kabir
    Fortman, Joshua
    Swanson, Ryan M.
    Wright, Mark M.
    Satrio, Justinus A.
    Brown, Robert C.
    Daugaard, Daren E.
    Platon, Alex
    Kothandaraman, Geetha
    Hsu, David D.
    Dutta, Abhijit
    [J]. FUEL, 2010, 89 : S29 - S35
  • [4] Use of mobile fast pyrolysis plants to densify biomass and reduce biomass handling costs - A preliminary assessment
    Badger, PC
    Fransham, P
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (04) : 321 - 325
  • [5] Basu P., 2013, Biomass gasification, pyrolysis and torrefaction: practical design and theory, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-396488-5.00005-8, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-396488-5.00005-8]
  • [6] Boerrigter H., 2006, Review of applications of gases from biomass gasification Energy Research of the Netherlands (ECN)
  • [7] Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading
    Bridgwater, A. V.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 38 : 68 - 94
  • [8] A techno-economic review of thermochemical cellulosic biofuel pathways
    Brown, Tristan R.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 178 : 166 - 176
  • [9] Techno-economic analysis of biobased chemicals production via integrated catalytic processing
    Brown, Tristan R.
    Zhang, Yanan
    Hu, Guiping
    Brown, Robert C.
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2012, 6 (01): : 73 - 87
  • [10] Campbell J. M., 1984, CAMPBELL PETROLEUM S, V2