How painful is donor nephrectomy?: Retrospective analysis of early pain and pain management in open versus laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy

被引:27
作者
Bachmann, Alexander
Wolff, Thomas
Giannini, Olivier
Dickenman, Michael
Ruszat, Robin
Guerke, Lorenz
Kaufmann, Mark
Gasser, Thomas C.
Steiger, Juerg
Stief, Christian G.
Sulser, Tullio
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Urol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Surg, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Basel Hosp, Div Transplantat Immunol & Nephrol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[4] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[5] Univ Munich, Dept Urol, Munich, Germany
关键词
retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy; laparoscopic nephrectomy; postoperative pain; living kidney donation; donor nephrectomy; SCALE;
D O I
10.1097/01.tp.0000225800.69089.b4
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative pain and pain management after standard open (ODN), hand-assisted laparoscopic (HLDN) and retroperitoneoscopic (RDN) donor nephrectomy. Methods. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was determined twice a day in 203 donors during the first five days after nephrectomy. Results. Mean VAS was significantly lower after RDN and HLDN than after ODN on day 2 (p=0.004) and days 3-5 (p < 0.001). After RDN, "no pain" (VAS=0) was reported significantly earlier than after ODN. Irrespective of the technique used and the pain management, all donors reported significantly higher VAS in the morning. Opiates were administered for a significantly shorter average time period after RDN than after ODN (p = 0.005). Cumulative morphine equivalent doses were higher after ODN than after RDN (p=0.001). Mean VAS reported after HLDN and RDN was similar. Conclusions. In summary, RDN and HLDN were clearly associated with much less early pain than ODN, independently of the used pain management.
引用
收藏
页码:1735 / 1738
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? [J].
Collins, SL ;
Moore, RA ;
McQuay, HJ .
PAIN, 1997, 72 (1-2) :95-97
[2]  
CRAWFORD CW, 1974, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V40, P272
[3]   Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery [J].
Kehlet, H ;
Dahl, JB .
LANCET, 2003, 362 (9399) :1921-1928
[4]   THE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE - ITS USE IN PAIN MEASUREMENT [J].
LANGLEY, GB ;
SHEPPEARD, H .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 1985, 5 (04) :145-148
[5]   REASSESSMENT OF VERBAL AND VISUAL ANALOG RATINGS IN ANALGESIC STUDIES [J].
LITTMAN, GS ;
WALKER, BR ;
SCHNEIDER, BE .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1985, 38 (01) :16-23
[6]   Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy - A comparison with the open approach [J].
Ratner, LE ;
Kavoussi, LR ;
Sroka, M ;
Hiller, J ;
Weber, R ;
Schulman, PG ;
Montgomery, R .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 63 (02) :229-233
[7]   Retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy:: First clinical experiences in 19 operations [J].
Sulser, T ;
Gürke, L ;
Langer, I ;
Dickenmann, M ;
Steiger, J ;
Gasser, TC ;
Bachmann, A .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 (03) :257-262
[8]   Hand-assisted retroperitoheoscopic live donor nephrectomy in comparison to open and laparoscopic procedures:: A prospective study on donor morbidity and kidney function [J].
Sundqvist, P ;
Feuk, U ;
Häggman, M ;
Persson, AEG ;
Stridsberg, M ;
Wadström, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (01) :147-153
[9]   Living donor kidney transplantation: Standard procedure [J].
Testa, G .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (03) :937-938
[10]   Prospective, case matched comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic and open surgical live donor nephrectomy [J].
Wolf, JS ;
Marcovich, R ;
Merion, RM ;
Konnak, JW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (06) :1650-1653