A new parameterized approach for ionospheric tomography

被引:40
作者
Chen, Biyan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Lixin [1 ,3 ]
Dai, Wujiao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Xiaomin [4 ]
Xu, Ying [5 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Geosci & Infophys, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Sch Geosci & Infophys, Key Lab Metallogen Predict Nonferrous Met & Geol, Minist Educ, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Key Lab Precise Engn Surveying & Deformat Disaste, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ, GNSS Res Ctr, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Geomat, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Parameterized ionospheric tomography; Ionospheric electron density (IED); Total electron content (TEC); Ionosonde; Swarm; WATER-VAPOR TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRON-DENSITY; GNSS OBSERVATIONS; RECONSTRUCTION; MODEL; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1007/s10291-019-0893-4
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
GNSS ionospheric tomography technique is capable to reconstruct the high-quality 3D ionospheric electron density (IED) images with a relatively low cost. We present a new parameterized approach for refining the voxel-based ionospheric tomography modeling. This approach is different to most other voxel-based techniques as they assume a homogeneous IED distribution in each voxel that is unreasonable for the tomography modeling. In this method, IED of any point within a voxel is determined via vertically exponential interpolation and horizontally inverse distance weighted interpolation from the IED values at the eight corners of that voxel. The parameterized tomography is tested with real data collected over the period of June 1-30, 2015 from 45 GPS stations in south China. The superiority of the new parameterized method is verified by comparison with the traditional nonparametric method. The new parameterized method outperforms the traditional method by 12%, 10%, 5% and 2% for vertical resolutions of 25km, 50km, 75km and 100km, respectively, in the self-consistency validation by GPS data. Such improvements are 20%, 24%, 22% and 16%, respectively, when assessed by the Swarm in situ IEDs. In terms of the vertical layer discretization, configurations using the resolution of 25km generally performs better than the other three vertical resolutions. Overall, the parameterized method using a vertical resolution of 25km achieves the best performance from the comprehensive comparisons with ionospheric data derived by GPS, ionosonde and Swarm satellites.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Ray tracing technique for global 3-D modeling of ionospheric electron density using GNSS measurements [J].
Alizadeh, Mohamad Mahdi ;
Schuh, Harald ;
Schmidt, Michael .
RADIO SCIENCE, 2015, 50 (06) :539-553
[2]   SIMULTANEOUS ALGEBRAIC RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE (SART) - A SUPERIOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ART ALGORITHM [J].
ANDERSEN, AH ;
KAK, AC .
ULTRASONIC IMAGING, 1984, 6 (01) :81-94
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, IONOSPHERIC PRECURSO
[4]  
Austen JR, 1986, INT BEACON SATELLITE, P25
[5]   Development of a GNSS water vapour tomography system using algebraic reconstruction techniques [J].
Bender, Michael ;
Dick, Galina ;
Ge, Maorong ;
Deng, Zhiguo ;
Wickert, Jens ;
Kahle, Hans-Gert ;
Raabe, Armin ;
Tetzlaff, Gerd .
ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2011, 47 (10) :1704-1720
[6]  
Bhuyan K, 2002, CURR SCI INDIA, V83, P1117
[7]   Assessment of the NeQuick model at mid-latitudes using GNSS TEC and ionosonde data [J].
Bidaine, B. ;
Warnant, R. .
ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2010, 45 (09) :1122-1128
[8]   History, current state, and future directions of ionospheric imaging [J].
Bust, Gary S. ;
Mitchell, Cathryn N. .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2008, 46 (01)
[9]   Ionospheric data assimilation three-dimensional (IDA3D): A global, multisensor, electron density specification algorithm [J].
Bust, GS ;
Garner, TW ;
Gaussiran, TL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2004, 109 (A11)
[10]   Voxel-optimized regional water vapor tomography and comparison with radiosonde and numerical weather model [J].
Chen, Biyan ;
Liu, Zhizhao .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2014, 88 (07) :691-703