Psychometric evaluation of disordered eating measures in bariatric surgery patients

被引:29
作者
Parker, Katrina [1 ,2 ]
Mitchell, Sarah [2 ]
O'Brien, Paul [1 ]
Brennan, Leah [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, CORE, Alfred Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Psychol Sci, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[3] Australian Catholic Univ, Sch Psychol, Melbourne, Vic 3065, Australia
关键词
Psychometrics; Reliability; Validity; Disordered eating; Bariatric surgery; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EXAMINATION-QUESTIONNAIRE; WEIGHT-LOSS; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; DIETARY RESTRAINT; BEHAVIOR; OBESITY; HEALTH; SIZE; DISINHIBITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.05.007
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Introduction: Bariatric surgery is considered the most effective weight loss intervention for obese persons. However, accurate assessment is essential to identify disordered eating that may impair achievement of optimal post-surgical outcomes. Measures of disordered eating are yet to be thoroughly psychometrically evaluated in bariatric surgery patients, therefore their utility is unknown. Methods: Participants were 108 adults who completed psychological measures approximately 12 months after bariatric surgery. The fit of the original scale structures was tested using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and alternative factor solutions were generated using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). Reliability (internal consistency) and construct validity (convergent and divergent) were also assessed. Materials: Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), Questionnaire of Eating and Weight Patterns Revised (QEWP-R), Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) and Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA). Results: CFA revealed none of the original disordered eating measures met adequate fit statistics. EFA produced revised scales with improved reliability (original scales alpha = 0.47-0.94; revised scales alpha = 0.76-0.98) and correlational analyses with measures of psychological wellbeing and impairment demonstrated adequate convergent validity. Reported prevalence of disordered eating behaviours differed between the EDE-Q and QEWP-R. Conclusions: Psychometric evaluation did not support the use of the commonly used disordered eating measures in bariatric patients in their original form. The revised version of the EDE-Q replicates findings from recent research in bariatric surgery candidates. The alternate structures of the CIA and TFEQ suggest differences in the manifestation of disordered eating following surgery. Results suggest that revised measures are required to overcome the limitations of existing measures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 48
页数:10
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Confirmatory factor analysis of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) [J].
Allen, Karina L. ;
Byrne, Susan M. ;
Lampard, Amy ;
Watson, Hunna ;
Fursland, Anthea .
EATING BEHAVIORS, 2011, 12 (02) :143-151
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnosing the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DOI 10.5555/appi.books.9780890425596.x00pre
[3]  
[Anonymous], LAP BAND SOLUTION PA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults, Adolescents and Children in Australia
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, MULTIDIMENSIONAL BOD
[6]  
Arbuckle J. L., 2012, AMOS 21 0 US GUID
[7]   Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories-IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients [J].
Beck, AT ;
Steer, RA ;
Ball, R ;
Ranieri, WF .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1996, 67 (03) :588-597
[8]   Psychometric evaluation of the eating disorder examination and eating disorder examination-questionnaire: A systematic review of the literature [J].
Berg, Kelly C. ;
Peterson, Carol B. ;
Frazier, Patricia ;
Crow, Scott J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2012, 45 (03) :428-438
[9]  
Bohn K., 2008, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Eating Disorders, P315, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780195373622.013.0019
[10]   The measurement of impairment due to eating disorder psychopathology [J].
Bohn, Kristin ;
Doll, Helen A. ;
Cooper, Zafra ;
O'Connor, Marianne ;
Palmer, Robert L. ;
Fairburn, Christopher G. .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2008, 46 (10) :1105-1110