Intention rationality

被引:11
作者
Bratman, Michael E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Philosophy, Sch Human & Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
intention; planning; practical rationality; practical reasons; self-governance;
D O I
10.1080/13869790903067717
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The practical thought of planning agents is subject to distinctive rationality norms. In particular, there are norms of intention consistency and of means-end coherence. I discuss the normative significance of these norms and their relation to practical reasons. I seek a path between views that see these norms as, at bottom, norms of theoretical rationality, and views that see the idea that these norms have distinctive normative significance as a 'myth'. And I seek to distinguish these norms from principles about the transmission of practical reasons. In the end, my view draws on claims about what is involved in being a self-governing planning agent.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 241
页数:15
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J ETHICS SOCIAL PHIL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, PROBLEMS RATIONALITY
[3]   INTENTION AND MEANS-END REASONING [J].
BRATMAN, M .
PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1981, 90 (02) :252-265
[4]  
Bratman M., 2007, Structures of Agency: Essays
[5]  
Bratman M.E., 2009, REASONS ACTION, P13
[6]  
BRATMAN ME, ANAL REV IN PRESS
[7]  
BRATMAN ME, PHILOS SOCI IN PRESS
[8]  
BRATMAN ME, SPHERES REA IN PRESS
[9]  
Bratman Michael., 1987, Intention, Plans, and
[10]   Intention, Practical Rationality, and Self-Governance [J].
Bratman, Michael E. .
ETHICS, 2009, 119 (03) :411-443