Non-preemptible last section assignment for reducing feedback latency in real-time control systems

被引:1
作者
Song, Chi Young [1 ]
Kim, Byung Kook [2 ]
机构
[1] Agcy Def Dev, Taejon 300600, South Korea
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Taejon, South Korea
关键词
control performance; real-time control; feedback latency; scheduling;
D O I
10.1080/00207720802692248
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A real-time control system design procedure consists of the controller design stage and the implementation stage. In the controller design stage, various digital control theories are used with assumptions, such as synchronous sampling, no sampling jitter and negligible feedback latency (latency from sensing to actuation). However, in the implementation stage, multiple control tasks are usually scheduled on a processor, which creates a finite sampling period, varying feedback latency and sampling jitter, and therefore the controller's performance is degraded. In this article, we investigate the relationship between control performance and timing parameters. In the course of this investigation, we found that the feedback latency is the dominant factor affecting control performance. In addition, we propose a rate monotonic (RM) scheduler with non-preemptible last section algorithm, which can reduce the feedback latency considerably. The proposed algorithm provides better control performance than a preemptive RM scheduler, in most cases. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is shown in illustrative examples.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 495
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Real-time Curative Actions for Power Systems via Online Feedback Optimization
    Ortmann, Lukas
    Hotz, Gianni
    Bolognani, Saverio
    Dorfler, Florian
    2023 IEEE BELGRADE POWERTECH, 2023,
  • [22] Real-time feedback control of reactive ion etching using neural networks
    Kim, T
    Stokes, D
    May, G
    ICNN - 1996 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOLS. 1-4, 1996, : 2039 - 2043
  • [23] Adaptive and Real-time Optimal Control for Adaptive Optics Systems
    Doelman, Niek
    Fraanje, Rufus
    Houtzager, Ivo
    Verhaegen, Michel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2009, 15 (3-4) : 480 - 488
  • [24] Deterministic and Stochastic QoS Provision for Real-Time Control Systems
    Fontanelli, Daniele
    Palopoli, Luigi
    Greco, Luca
    17TH IEEE REAL-TIME AND EMBEDDED TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS SYMPOSIUM (RTAS 2011), 2011, : 103 - 112
  • [25] Quality-of-control management in overloaded real-time systems
    Buttazzo, Giorgio
    Velasco, Manel
    Marti, Pau
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, 2007, 56 (02) : 253 - 266
  • [26] Modelling real-time control options on virtual sewer systems
    Borsanyi, Peter
    Benedetti, Lorenzo
    Dirckx, Geert
    De Keyser, Webbey
    Muschalla, Dirk
    Solvi, Anne-Marie
    Vandenberghe, Veronique
    Weyand, Michael
    Vanrolleghem, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2008, 7 (04) : 395 - 410
  • [27] Modeling and real-time control of urban drainage systems: A review
    Garcia, L.
    Barreiro-Gomez, J.
    Escobar, E.
    Tellez, D.
    Quijano, N.
    Ocampo-Martinez, C.
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2015, 85 : 120 - 132
  • [28] Establishing timing requirements for control loops in real-time systems
    Bate, I
    McDermid, J
    Nightingale, P
    MICROPROCESSORS AND MICROSYSTEMS, 2003, 27 (04) : 159 - 169
  • [29] Real-Time Optimal Control of Seat-Belt Systems
    Oom, Michiel
    de Jager, Bram
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01): : 10717 - 10722
  • [30] Real-time adaptive neural control of a class of nonlinear systems
    Lizarraga, I
    Etxebarria, V
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1999, 12 (01) : 3 - 19