Media attention and policy response: 21st century chemical regulation in the USA

被引:2
作者
Matus, Kira J. M. [1 ]
Bernal, Marie N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Div Publ Policy, Div Social Sci, Div Environm & Sustainabil,Kowloon, Room 4616D,Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Div Publ Policy, Kowloon, Room 4616D,Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
chemical policy; risk perception; media influence; media narratives; US policy; chemical regulation; policy innovation; issue framing; SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION; RISK PERCEPTION; COMMUNICATION; TOXICITY; INFORMATION; GOVERNMENT; BEHAVIOR; SCIENCE; TRUST; MASS;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scaa034
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article explores the relationship between media coverage of chemical hazards, scientific understandings of chemical risk, and policy change in the USA at the state level from 1990 to 2010. We observe that media coverage compounded by scientific development, especially in relation to a greater understanding of chemical hazards and approaches to its management, affected public perception of health and environmental risk, aiding in a shift of expectations about necessary levels of statutory protection from the states. We also note the emergence of effective framings of chemical risk around impacts on vulnerable populations, such as children, where media attention and policy action created important coalitions of support. The resulting increased state-, county-, and city-level policy action eventually led to support and momentum policy change at the federal level. This study helps to clarify how media attention to chemical hazards may play an important role in influencing eventual policy responses and risk management approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 560
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Risk perception and bottled water use
    Anadu, EC
    Harding, AK
    [J]. JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2000, 92 (11): : 82 - +
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1992, United Nations Conference on Environment Development-Agenda 21, P3
  • [3] Ashford Nicholas A, 2004, Int J Occup Med Environ Health, V17, P59
  • [4] Comparative Studies of Policy Dynamics
    Baumgartner, Frank R.
    Jones, Bryan D.
    Wilkerson, John
    [J]. COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2011, 44 (08) : 947 - 972
  • [5] Approaches for describing and communicating overall uncertainty in toxicity characterizations: US Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) as a case study
    Beck, Nancy B.
    Becker, Richard A.
    Erraguntla, Neeraja
    Farland, William H.
    Grant, Roberta L.
    Gray, George
    Kirman, Christopher
    LaKind, Judy S.
    Lewis, R. Jeffrey
    Nance, Patricia
    Pottenger, Lynn H.
    Santos, Susan L.
    Shirley, Stephanie
    Simon, Ted
    Dourson, Michael L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 89-90 : 110 - 128
  • [6] Toxic Chemicals in Toys and Children's Products: Limitations of Current Responses and Recommendations for Government and Industry
    Becker, Monica
    Edwards, Sally
    Massey, Rachel I.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (21) : 7986 - 7991
  • [7] THE DRIVE FOR A SAFER CHEMICALS POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES
    Belliveau, Michael E.
    [J]. NEW SOLUTIONS-A JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH POLICY, 2011, 21 (03) : 359 - 386
  • [8] Chemical reaction: The US response to REACH
    Black, Harvey
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 116 (03) : A124 - A127
  • [9] Daughton C. G., 2005, Renewable Resources Journal, V23, P6
  • [10] DiMento J.F. C., 2007, Climate Change: What It Means for Us, Our Children, and Our Grandchildren