Evaluation of the porcine model to teach various ancillary procedures to gynecologic oncology fellows

被引:16
作者
Hoffman, Mitchel S. [1 ]
Ondrovic, Leo E. [2 ]
Wenham, Robert M. [1 ]
Apte, Sachin M. [1 ]
Shames, Murray L. [3 ]
Zervos, Emanuel E. [4 ]
Weinberg, William S. [5 ]
Roberts, William S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Coll Med, Tampa, FL 33606 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Dept Comparat Med, Div Surg Educ, Tampa, FL 33606 USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Div Vasc Surg, Tampa, FL 33606 USA
[4] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Div Digest Surg, Tampa, FL 33606 USA
[5] Surg Device Div, Mansfield, MA USA
关键词
gynecologic oncology; porcine; surgical training; PARAAORTIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; SIMULATOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.050
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to subjectively evaluate the adequacy of the porcine model for training gynecologic oncology fellows. STUDY DESIGN: Following a defined surgical curriculum, fellow-attending pairs operated on female hogs. A predetermined dataset was collected for each procedure. RESULTS: Twenty pigs were operated on. The porcine model was determined to be a good model for laparoscopic lymphadenectomy (11), ureteroneocystostomy (7), repair of vascular injury (11), bowel anastamoses (21), distal pancreatectomy (5), nephrectomy (6), partial hepatectomy (5), diaphram stripping (5), and diaphragmatic resection (4). Two attendings and 1 fellow judged the porcine model to be fair (remaining 11 good) for ileocolonic urinary diversion, mainly due to significant differences in anatomy. Liver mobilization (5) and splenectomy (11) were determined to be fair or poor models by all participants due to the limited attachments in the pig. CONCLUSION: The porcine model is adequate for teaching some ancillary gynecologic oncology surgical procedures and is inadequate for others.
引用
收藏
页码:116.e1 / 116.e3
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Preliminary technique of laparoscopic extraperitoneal infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in the porcine model [J].
Atlas, I ;
Sert, MB ;
Childers, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1998, 5 (03) :283-287
[2]  
GETTY R, 1975, SISSON GROSSMANS ANA, V2, P1268
[3]   Accuracy and safety of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy: An experimental prospective randomized study [J].
Lanvin, D ;
Elhage, A ;
Henry, B ;
Leblanc, E ;
Querleu, D ;
DelobelleDeroide, A .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1997, 67 (01) :83-87
[4]   A six-year study of surgical teaching and skills evaluation for obstetric/gynecologic residents in porcine and inanimate surgical models [J].
Lentz, GM ;
Mandel, LS ;
Goff, BA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (06) :2056-2061
[5]  
LOCKHART JL, 1991, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V173, P289
[6]   Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgical simulator [J].
McDougall, EM ;
Corica, FA ;
Boker, JR ;
Sala, LG ;
Stoliar, G ;
Borin, JF ;
T Chu, F ;
Clayman, RV .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2006, 202 (05) :779-787
[7]   Learning curves for transperitoneal laparoscopic and extraperitoneal endoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy [J].
Occelli, B ;
Narducci, F ;
Lanvin, D ;
LeBlanc, E ;
Querleu, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2000, 7 (01) :51-53
[8]   Proficiency maintenance: Impact of ongoing simulator training on laparoscopic skill retention [J].
Stefanidis, D ;
Korndorffer, JR ;
Markley, S ;
Sierra, R ;
Scott, DJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2006, 202 (04) :599-603