Content Validity Testing of the Maternal Fetal Triage Index

被引:50
作者
Ruhl, Catherine [1 ]
Scheich, Benjamin [2 ]
Onokpise, Brea [3 ]
Bingham, Debra [4 ]
机构
[1] Assoc Womens Hlth Obstetr & Neonatal Nurses, Womens Hlth Programs, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Assoc Womens Hlth Obstetr & Neonatal Nurses, Data Analyt, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[3] Assoc Womens Hlth Obstetr & Neonatal Nurses, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[4] Assoc Womens Hlth Obstetr & Neonatal Nurses, Nursing Res Educ & Practice, Washington, DC 20036 USA
来源
JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING | 2015年 / 44卷 / 06期
关键词
Maternal Fetal Triage Index; obstetric triage; standardization; content validity; OBSTETRIC TRIAGE; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/1552-6909.12763
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo describe the development and content validity testing of the Maternal Fetal Triage Index (MFTI), a standardized tool for obstetric triage. DesignOnline survey. ParticipantsParticipants included 15 registered nurses, 15 certified nurse-midwives, and 15 physicians from across the United States who provided maternity care. MethodsA convenience sample of experienced clinicians was used as content validators for the MFTI. An item content validity index (I-CVI) was computed for the tool's items and a scale content validity index (S-CVI) was computed for the tool's scale based on the responses submitted via the online survey. Two rounds of content validation occurred. ResultsIn the first round of testing, a total of 12 of 61 items in the MFTI did not meet the I-CVI threshold of greater than 0.78 because of disagreement about clinical condition (75%) or priority level placement (25%). In the second round of testing, all but 3 of the 69 content items in the revised version of the MFTI had I-CVI thresholds greater than 0.78. These 3 items were related to vital sign values. The overall S-CVI score calculated for Round 2 only was 0.95, which was greater than the threshold of 0.90. ConclusionThe results of the content validity testing of multidisciplinary validators suggest that the MFTI is a valid tool for use in obstetric triage and evaluation settings.
引用
收藏
页码:701 / 709
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quailty, 2012, EM SEV IND ESI TRIAG
[2]  
American College of Emergency Physicians, 2010, ACEP POL STAT TRIAG
[3]   OBSTETRIC TRIAGE: A Systematic Review of the Past Fifteen Years: 1998-2013 [J].
Angelini, Diane ;
Howard, Elisabeth .
MCN-THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-CHILD NURSING, 2014, 39 (05) :284-297
[4]   Nursing Care Quality Measurement [J].
不详 .
JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2014, 43 (01) :132-133
[5]  
Association of Women's Health Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses, 2014, WOM HLTH PER NURS CA
[6]  
Association of Women's Health Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses, 2010, GUID PROF REG NURS S
[7]  
Emergency Nurses Association, 2011, TRIAG QUALI
[8]  
LYNN MR, 1986, NURS RES, V35, P382
[9]  
Martin Joyce A, 2015, Natl Vital Stat Rep, V64, P1
[10]   Triage of pregnant women in the emergency department: evaluation of a triage decision aid [J].
McCarthy, Mary ;
McDonald, Susan ;
Pollock, Wendy .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2013, 30 (02) :117-122