Phylogeny of sex-determining mechanisms in squamate reptiles: are sex chromosomes an evolutionary trap?

被引:174
作者
Pokorna, Martina [2 ]
Kratochvil, Lukas [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Sci, Dept Ecol, CR-12844 Prague 2, Czech Republic
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Sci, Dept Zool, CR-12844 Prague 2, Czech Republic
关键词
environmental sex determination; lizards; sex ratio; temperature; ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; TEMPERATURE; LIZARD; AMPHISBAENIANS; COOCCURRENCE; MORPHOLOGY; REVERSAL; ANCIENT; NUCLEAR;
D O I
10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00481.x
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Squamate reptiles possess two general modes of sex determination: (1) genotypic sex determination (GSD), where the sex of an individual is determined by sex chromosomes, i.e. by sex-specific differences in genotype; and (2) temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD), where sex chromosomes are absent and sex is determined by nongenetic factors. After gathering information about sex-determining mechanisms for more than 400 species, we employed comparative phylogenetic analyses to reconstruct the evolution of sex determination in Squamata. Our results suggest relative uniformity in sex-determining mechanisms in the majority of the squamate lineages. Well-documented variability is found only in dragon lizards (Agamidae) and geckos (Gekkota). Polarity of the sex-determining mechanisms in outgroups identified TSD as the ancestral mode for Squamata. After extensive review of the literature, we concluded that to date there is no known well-documented transition from GSD to TSD in reptiles, although transitions in the opposite direction are plentiful and well corroborated by cytogenetic evidence. We postulate that the evolution of sex-determining mechanisms in Squamata was probably restricted to the transitions from ancestral TSD to GSD. In other words, transitions were from the absence of sex chromosomes to the emergence of sex chromosomes, which have never disappeared and constitute an evolutionary trap. This evolutionary trap hypothesis could change the understanding of phylogenetic conservatism of sex-determining systems in many large clades such as butterflies, snakes, birds, and mammals. (C) 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 156, 168-183.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 183
页数:16
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MESQUITE MODULAR SYS
[2]   Reconstructing an island radiation using ancient and recent DNA:: the extinct and living day geckos (Phelsuma) of the Mascarene islands [J].
Austin, JJ ;
Arnold, EN ;
Jones, CG .
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2004, 31 (01) :109-122
[3]   Sex determination: Are two mechanisms better than one? [J].
Bull, J. J. .
JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 2008, 33 (01) :5-8
[4]  
Bull J. J., 1983, Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms
[5]  
Burt A., 2006, Genes in Conflict: the Biology of Selfish Genetic Elements
[6]   Y chromosome of D-pseudoobscura is not homologous to the ancestral Drosophila Y [J].
Carvalho, AB ;
Clark, AG .
SCIENCE, 2005, 307 (5706) :108-110
[7]  
Charlesworth B, 2002, NOVART FDN SYMP, V244, P207
[8]  
CHARNOV E L, 1982
[9]   WHEN IS SEX ENVIRONMENTALLY DETERMINED [J].
CHARNOV, EL ;
BULL, JJ .
NATURE, 1977, 266 (5605) :828-830
[10]   ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENT SEX DETERMINATION IN A FISH [J].
CONOVER, DO .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1984, 123 (03) :297-313