Assessment of Reliability and Validity of SF-12v2 among a Diabetic Population

被引:40
作者
Kathe, Niranjan [1 ]
Hayes, Corey J. [1 ,2 ]
Bhandari, Naleen Raj [1 ]
Payakachat, Nalin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Div Pharmaceut Evaluat & Policy, Coll Pharm, 4301 West Markham,Slot 522, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Inst Psychiat Res, Div Hlth Serv Res, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
关键词
confirmatory factor analysis; diabetes; SF-6D; SF-12v2; validation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FORM HEALTH SURVEY; VALIDATION; SF-36; RESPONSIVENESS; DEPRESSION; SCORES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: To validate the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form version 2 (SF-12v2) in diabetic patients. Methods: Adults with self-reported diabetes from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2011-2013) were identified. Reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) and validity (construct, concurrent, criterion, and predictive) of the SF-12v2 were assessed. The SF-12v2 consists of two normalized composite scores: the physical component summary score (PCS12) and the mental component summary score (MCS12). Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess the instrument structure. Concurrent (convergent and discriminant) validity was assessed by a multitrait-multimethod matrix using the Patient Health Questionnaire, the Kessler Scale, and perceived health and mental health questions. The predictive validity was assessed by estimating future limitations. The concurrent validity was tested by comparing the MCS12, PCS12, and utility scores (six-dimensional health state short form) across comorbidity scores. Results: The final sample comprised 2214 diabetic patients with mean normalized (population mean 50; range 0-100) PCS12 and MCS12 scores of 40.81 (standard error 0.33) and 49.82 (standard error 0.26), respectively. The PCS12 and MCS12 scores showed good internal consistency (Cronbach a: PCS12 0.85; MCS12 0.83) and acceptable test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: PCS12 0.72; MCS12 0.63) and produced acceptable goodness-of-fit indices (normed fit index 0.95; comparative fit index 0.95; root mean square error of approximation 0.11 [95% confidence interval 0.1017-0.1188]). The PCS12 and MCS12 were moderately correlated with perceived health and perceived mental health. The MCS12 was highly correlated with the Patient Health Questionnaire and the Kessler Scale. Both the PCS12 and the MCS12 could predict the future health limitations. The PCS12, MCS12, and utility scores demonstrated sensitivity to the presence of comorbidity scores. Conclusions: The SF-12v2 is a valid generic instrument for measuring quality of life in diabetic patients.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 440
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]  
Nunnally J.C., 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY
[32]  
Ortiz Z, 1999, J RHEUMATOL, V26, P210
[33]   Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review [J].
Schreiber, James B. ;
Nora, Amaury ;
Stage, Frances K. ;
Barlow, Elizabeth A. ;
King, Jamie .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 99 (06) :323-337
[34]   Quality of life, health status and clinical outcomes in Type 2 diabetes patients [J].
Sundaram, Murali ;
Kavookjian, Jan ;
Patrick, Julie Hicks ;
Miller, Lesley-Ann ;
Madhavan, S. Suresh ;
Scott, Virginia Ginger .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (02) :165-177
[35]   The development and validation of a neuropathy- and foot ulcer-specific quality of life instrument [J].
Vileikyte, L ;
Peyrot, M ;
Bundy, C ;
Rubin, RR ;
Leventhal, H ;
Mora, P ;
Shaw, JE ;
Baker, P ;
Boulton, AJM .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (09) :2549-2555
[36]  
Ware J. E., 1998, SCORE SF 12 PHYS MEN
[37]  
Ware J. E., 1994, SF 36 PHYS MENTAL HL
[38]   A 12-item short-form health survey - Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity [J].
Ware, JE ;
Kosinski, M ;
Keller, SD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1996, 34 (03) :220-233
[39]   Comparative responsiveness of generic and specific quality-of-life instruments [J].
Wiebe, S ;
Guyatt, G ;
Weaver, B ;
Matijevic, S ;
Sidwell, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (01) :52-60