Vulnerability and resilience to pandemic-related stress among US women pregnant at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:194
作者
Preis, Heidi [1 ,2 ]
Mahaffey, Brittain [3 ]
Heiselman, Cassandra [4 ]
Lobel, Marci [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Psychol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Renaissance Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Renaissance Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Hlth, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[4] SUNY Stony Brook, Renaissance Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Med, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
COVID-19; Stress; Pregnancy; Maternal health; Prenatal maternal stress; Pandemic-related pregnancy stress;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113348
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Rationale: Women pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic are experiencing moderate to high levels of emotional distress, which has previously been shown to be attributable to two types of pandemic-related pregnancy stress: stress associated with feeling unprepared for birth due to the pandemic (Preparedness Stress) and stress related to fears of perinatal COVID-19 infection (Perinatal Infection Stress). Objective. Given the well-documented harms associated with elevated prenatal stress and the critical importance of developing appropriately targeted interventions, we investigated factors predictive of pandemic-related pregnancy stress. Method. Between April 25 and May 15, 2020, 4,451 pregnant women in the U.S. were recruited via social media to complete an online questionnaire that included sociodemographic, medical, and COVID-19 situational factors, as well as the Pandemic-Related Pregnancy Stress Scale (PREPS). Binary logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for high stress. Results. Nearly 30% of participants reported high Preparedness Stress; a similar proportion reported high Perinatal Infection Stress. Abuse history, chronic illness, income loss due to the pandemic, perceived risk of having had COVID-19, alterations to prenatal appointments, high-risk pregnancy, and being a woman of color were associated with greater levels of one or both types of stress. Access to outdoor space, older age, and engagement in healthy behaviors were protective against stress. Conclusions. Practices that may alleviate pandemic-related stress such as minimizing disruptions to prenatal care, ensuring access to outdoor space, and motivating engagement in health behaviors are of vital importance. Particular attention is needed for more vulnerable populations including women of color, women with a history of abuse, and those with high-risk pregnancy. Research focused on the short and longer-term impact of pandemic-related pregnancy stress on maternal mental and physical health, perinatal outcomes, and child development is critical to identify these effects and marshal appropriate resources to reduce them.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Stress and chronic illness: The inflammatory pathway
    Acabchuk, Rebecca L.
    Kamath, Jayesh
    Salamone, John D.
    Johnson, Blair T.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 185 : 166 - 170
  • [2] Amiel Castro R., GERMAN VERSION PANDE
  • [3] Risk factors for antenatal anxiety: A systematic review of the literature
    Bayrampour, Hamideh
    Vinturache, Angela
    Hetherington, Erin
    Lorenzetti, Diane L.
    Tough, Suzanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 36 (05) : 476 - 503
  • [4] Psychological impact of infectious disease outbreaks on pregnant women: rapid evidence review
    Brooks, S. K.
    Weston, D.
    Greenberg, N.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 189 : 26 - 36
  • [5] The COVID-19 pandemic and perinatal mental health
    Caparros-Gonzalez, Rafael A.
    Alderdice, Fiona
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 38 (03) : 223 - 225
  • [7] Screening for Intimate Partner Violence, Elder Abuse, and Abuse of Vulnerable Adults US Preventive Services Task Force Final Recommendation Statement
    Curry, Susan J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 320 (16): : 1678 - 1687
  • [8] Davenport M.H., 2020, FRONTIERS GLOBAL WOM, V1, DOI [10.3389/fgwb.2020.00001, DOI 10.3389/FGWB.2020.00001]
  • [9] Feasibility and Acceptability of Screening for Adverse Childhood Experiences in Prenatal Care
    Flanagan, Tracy
    Alabaster, Amy
    McCaw, Brigid
    Stoller, Nicole
    Watson, Carey
    Young-Wolff, Kelly C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2018, 27 (07) : 903 - 911
  • [10] COVID-19, Home Confinement, and the Fallacy of "Safest at Home"
    Froimson, Jill R.
    Bryan, Darren S.
    Bryan, Ava Ferguson
    Zakrison, Tanya L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 110 (07) : 960 - 961