A framework for cumulative risk assessment in the 21st century

被引:48
作者
Moretto, Angelo [1 ,2 ]
Bachman, Ammie [3 ]
Boobis, Alan [4 ]
Solomon, Keith R. [5 ]
Pastoor, Timothy P. [6 ]
Wilks, Martin F. [7 ]
Embry, Michelle R. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dipartimento Sci Biomed & Clin, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Luigi Sacco Hosp, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Int Ctr Pesticides & Hlth Risks Prevent ICPS, Milan, Italy
[3] ExxonMobil Biomed Sci Inc, Annandale, NJ USA
[4] Imperial Coll London, London, England
[5] Univ Guelph, Sch Environm Sci, Ctr Toxicol, Guelph, ON, Canada
[6] Syngenta Crop Protect, Greensboro, NC USA
[7] Univ Basel, Swiss Ctr Appl Human Toxicol, Basel, Switzerland
[8] ILSI Hlth & Environm Sci Inst, Washington, DC 20005 USA
关键词
Chemical stressors; cumulative risk assessment; non-chemical stressors; RISK21; risk assessment; EXPOSURE; ROADMAP;
D O I
10.1080/10408444.2016.1211618
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
The ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) has developed a framework to support a transition in the way in which information for chemical risk assessment is obtained and used (RISK21). The approach is based on detailed problem formulation, where exposure drives the data acquisition process in order to enable informed decision-making on human health safety as soon as sufficient evidence is available. Information is evaluated in a transparent and consistent way with the aim of optimizing available resources. In the context of risk assessment, cumulative risk assessment (CRA) poses additional problems and questions that can be addressed using the RISK21 approach. The focus in CRA to date has generally been on chemicals that have common mechanisms of action. Recently, concern has also been expressed about chemicals acting on multiple pathways that lead to a common health outcome, and non-chemical other conditions (non-chemical stressors) that can lead to or modify a common outcome. Acknowledging that CRAs, as described above, are more conceptually, methodologically and computationally complex than traditional single-stressor risk assessments, RISK21 further developed the framework for implementation of workable processes and procedures for conducting assessments of combined effects from exposure to multiple chemicals and non-chemical stressors. As part of the problem formulation process, this evidence-based framework allows the identification of the circumstances in which it is appropriate to conduct a CRA for a group of compounds. A tiered approach is then proposed, where additional chemical stressors and/or non-chemical modulating factors (ModFs) are considered sequentially. Criteria are provided to facilitate the decision on whether or not to include ModFs in the formal quantitative assessment, with the intention to help focus the use of available resources to have the greatest potential to protect public health.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 97
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Scientific Opinion on the identification of pesticides to be included in cumulative assessment groups on the basis of their toxicological profile
    Aagaard, Alf
    Brock, Theo
    Capri, Ettore
    Duquesne, Sabine
    Filipic, Metka
    Hernandez-Jerez, Antonio
    Hirsch-Ernst, Karen Ildico
    Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
    Klein, Michael
    Kuhl, Thomas
    Laskowski, Ryszard
    Liess, Matthias
    Mantovani, Alberto
    Ockleford, Colin
    Ossendorp, Bernadette
    Pickford, Daniel
    Smith, Robert
    Sousa, Paulo
    Sundh, Ingvar
    Tiktak, Aaldrik
    Van Der Linden, Ton
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2013, 11 (07)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, SCI DEC ADV RISK ASS, DOI DOI 10.17226/12209
  • [3] [Anonymous], COMM FOC EXP RISK SC
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, REV ESP SALUD PUBLIC
  • [5] [Anonymous], URB HEART US MAN
  • [6] [Anonymous], ENV HLTH PERSPECT
  • [7] [Anonymous], USING EXPOSURE UNPUB
  • [8] [Anonymous], EPA600R06014F NAT CT
  • [9] [Anonymous], JOINT OP US THRESH T
  • [10] Critical analysis of literature on low-dose synergy for use in screening chemical mixtures for risk assessment
    Boobis, Alan
    Budinsky, Robert
    Collie, Shanna
    Crofton, Kevin
    Embry, Michelle
    Felter, Susan
    Hertzberg, Richard
    Kopp, David
    Mihlan, Gary
    Mumtaz, Moiz
    Price, Paul
    Solomon, Keith
    Teuschler, Linda
    Yang, Raymond
    Zaleski, Rosemary
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2011, 41 (05) : 369 - 383