The Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Readiness for Practice Survey for Nursing Students

被引:1
作者
Lee, Tae Wha [1 ,2 ]
Ji, Yoonjung [1 ,3 ]
Yoon, Yea Seul [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Nursing, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Mo Im Kim Nursing Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Education; Professional; Factor Analysis; Statistical; Reproducibility of Results; Nursing Education Research; SELF-REPORTED PREPAREDNESS; TRANSITION; ADAPTATION; WORK;
D O I
10.4040/jkan.22032
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Readiness for Practice Survey (K-RPS). Method: The English Readiness for Practice Survey was translated into Korean using the Translation, Review, Adjudication, Pretesting, and Documentation (TRAPD) method. Secondary data analysis was performed using the dataset from the New Nurse e-Cohort study (Panel 2020) in South Korea. This study used a nationally representative sample of 812 senior nursing students. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were also conducted. Convergent validity within the items and discriminant validity between factors were assessed to evaluate construct validity. Construct validity for hypothesis testing was evaluated using convergent and discriminant validity. Ordinary a was used to assess reliability. Results: The K-RPS comprises 20 items examining four factors: clinical problem solving, learning experience, professional responsibilities, and professional preparation. Although the convergent validity of the items was successfully verified, discriminant validity between the factors was not. The K-RPS construct validity was verified using a bi-factor model (CMIN/DF 2.20, RMSEA.06, TLI.97, CFI.97, and PGFI.59). The K-RPS was significantly correlated with self-esteem ( r =.43, p <.001) and anxiety about clinical practicum ( r = -.50, p <.001). Internal consistency was reliable based on an ordinary a of.88. Conclusion: The K-RPS is both valid and reliable and can be used as a standardized Korean version of the Readiness for Practice measurement tool.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 581
页数:18
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] A Ji Eun, 2018, [Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 간호행정학회지], V24, P51, DOI 10.11111/jkana.2018.24.1.51
  • [2] STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH
    ANDERSON, JC
    GERBING, DW
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) : 411 - 423
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, Guidelines for Best Practice in Cross-Cultural Surveys
  • [4] Bang Kyung-Sook, 2021, [The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 한국간호교육학회지], V27, P402, DOI 10.5977/jkasne.2021.27.4.402
  • [5] Caballero C., 2010, Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, V1, P13, DOI DOI 10.21153/JTLGE2010VOL1NO1ART546
  • [6] Readiness for Practice: The Senior Practicum Experience
    Casey, Kathy
    Fink, Regina
    Jaynes, Cathy
    Campbell, Linda
    Cook, Paul
    Wilson, Vicki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2011, 50 (11) : 646 - 652
  • [7] Cho H, 2006, J KOREA ACAD PUBLIC, V20, P163
  • [8] Cristobal E., 2007, MANAG SERV QUAL, V17, P317, DOI [10.1108/09604520710744326, DOI 10.1108/09604520710744326, DOI 10.1200/OP.20.00698]
  • [9] de Vet HCW, 2011, MEASUREMENT MED PRAC, P172
  • [10] Transition shock: the initial stage of role adaptation for newly graduated Registered Nurses
    Duchscher, Judy E. Boychuk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2009, 65 (05) : 1103 - 1113