Performance optimization and investigation of flow phenomena on tidal turbine blade airfoil considering cavitation and roughness

被引:25
作者
Sun, ZhaoCheng [1 ]
Mao, YuFeng [1 ]
Fan, MengHao [2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Acad Sci, Inst Oceang Instrumentat, Qingdao 266001, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Petr East China, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
关键词
Tidal current turbine; Airfoil; Multi-objective optimization; Cavitation; Roughness; LEADING-EDGE ROUGHNESS; AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN; TRANSITION; BUBBLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apor.2020.102463
中图分类号
P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Since the underwater impurity and cavitation could have a significant impact on the aerodynamic performance of tidal turbine blade airfoil, it is necessary to consider both roughness and cavitation in the process of optimization design. In the present study, a novel multi-objective evolution algorithm based on NSGA-II is proposed for the design of tidal turbine blade airfoil, to overcome the adverse effects of cavitation and roughness. Nonuniform rational B-spline (NURBS) representation is adopted in the process of optimization; a new performance evaluation index of airfoil under rough condition is formed; multi-objective optimization was conducted for NACA2415 airfoil. The minimum pressure coefficient is the criterion used for the identification of cavitation on tidal turbine blade airfoil. The CFD and XFOIL are employed to calculate the lift drag coefficient and pressure coefficient of airfoil. The transition position of airfoil is predicted by the improved transition model. A comprehensive experimental study was conducted to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of optimized airfoil, revealing flow patterns such as flow separation over the initial airfoil and optimized airfoil through smoke flow experiment. In order to simulate the rough condition, sandpaper was pasted on the leading edge surface of airfoil and experiments indicated that location and formation of laminar separation bubble were affected . Numerical simulation and experimental results show that the optimized airfoil enjoys a better aerodynamic performance than the original ones under the roughness condition, in terms of cavitation inhibition. Within the range of design conditions, the lift drag ratio of optimized airfoils increased by an average of 20% and the minimum pressure coefficient peak decreased by about 17.2% on average. Thus,the proposed method can effectively guide the design and technical reserve of the tidal turbine.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, TURBULENCE MODELING
  • [2] Hydrokinetic turbine blades: Design and local construction techniques for remote communities
    Anyi, Martin
    Kirke, Brian
    [J]. ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 15 (03) : 223 - 230
  • [3] Power and thrust measurements of marine current turbines under various hydrodynamic flow conditions in a cavitation tunnel and a towing tank
    Bahaj, A. S.
    Molland, A. F.
    Chaplin, J. R.
    Batten, W. M. J.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2007, 32 (03) : 407 - 426
  • [4] Performance-optimized airfoil for Darrieus wind turbines
    Bedon, Gabriele
    De Betta, Stefano
    Benini, Ernesto
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 94 : 328 - 340
  • [5] Casey M V, 1974, P C CAV ED
  • [6] Chen Yaqiong, 2015, Applied Mechanics and Materials, V744-746, P253, DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.744-746.253
  • [7] NURBS modeling and structural shape optimization of cardiovascular stents
    Clune, Rory
    Kelliher, Denis
    Robinson, James C.
    Campbell, John S.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2014, 50 (01) : 159 - 168
  • [8] Cocke T, 2012, 30 AIAA APPL AER C N
  • [9] A review of surface engineering issues critical to wind turbine performance
    Dalili, N.
    Edrisy, A.
    Carriveau, R.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (02) : 428 - 438
  • [10] A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
    Deb, K
    Pratap, A
    Agarwal, S
    Meyarivan, T
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) : 182 - 197