Economic analysis for national immunization program planning: A case of rotavirus vaccines in Burundi

被引:2
|
作者
Niyibitegeka, Fulgence [1 ]
Riewpaiboon, Arthorn [2 ]
Youngkong, Sitaporn [2 ]
Thavorncharoensap, Montarat [2 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Fac Pharm, Sci Program Social Econ & Adm Pharm, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Pharm, Div Social & Adm Pharm, 447 Sri Ayuthaya Rd, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
关键词
Rotavirus vaccine; Economic evaluation; Burundi; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; VACCINATION; COUNTRIES; DIARRHEA; EFFICACY; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.01.031
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: In Burundi, diarrhea is the third leading cause of mortality among children under five years of age. This study conducted an economic analysis of rotavirus vaccination program in Burundi. Methods: A Markov model was constructed to simulate clinical and economic outcomes for the 2019 birth cohort for a period of 5years. Empirical costing data were collected. ICER per episode averted, ICER per death averted, ICER per DALY averted, net present value, and budget impact were estimated for 4 brands of WHO pre-qualified rotavirus vaccines. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis as well as threshold analysis were performed. Results: For the base case, while all four WHO pre-qualified rotavirus vaccines were cost-effective (ICER<3 GDP per capita), three of them (i.e. Rotarix, Rotavac and Rotasiil) were very cost-effective (ICER <1 GDP per capita) from both the provider and societal perspectives. The vaccines were still very cost-effective at a price increase of up to US$ 5.09, US$ 3.16, US$ 3.89, and US$ 2.69 for Rotarix, RotaTeq, Rotavac, and Rotasiil, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that vaccination programs with Rotarix, RotaTeq, Rotavac, and Rotasiil are cost-effective at a probability of 93.8%, 27%, 99.1%, and 92.7%, respectively. All vaccination programs were cost-beneficial with a net present value in the range of US$ 5,214,912 and US$ 11,135,997.The budget required to run the vaccination program, estimated with break-even prices, ranged between US$ 42,249,498 and US$ 53,487,935 for a 5-year time period. When compared to the GDP of Burundi in 2019, these are are less than 2%. Conclusion: The rotavirus vaccine is good value for money. Findings from this study offer evidence on potential economic benefits as well as the required budget for different rotavirus vaccination programs, which could be useful for future planning related to rotavirus vaccine coverage in Burundi after graduation from GAVI. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1272 / 1282
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Need for Rotavirus Vaccine Introduction in the National Immunization Program of More Than 100 Countries around the World
    Karami, Manoochehr
    Berangi, Zeinab
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 39 (01) : 124 - 125
  • [32] Epidemiology of Group A Rotavirus Infection After the Introduction of Monovalent Vaccine in the National Immunization Program of Saudi Arabia
    Al-Ayed, Mohammed Saeed Zayed
    Asaad, Ahmed Morad
    Qureshi, Mohamed Ansar
    Hawan, Ali Abdullah
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2017, 89 (03) : 429 - 434
  • [33] Economic assessment of incorporating the hexavalent vaccine as part of the National Immunization Program of Peru
    Seinfeld, Janice
    Laura Rosales, Maria
    Sobrevilla, Alfredo
    Lopez Yescas, Juan Guillermo
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [34] Adding new childhood vaccines to China's National Immunization Program: evidence, benefits, and priorities
    Zhang, Haijun
    Lai, Xiaozhen
    Patenaude, Bryan N.
    Jit, Mark
    Fang, Hai
    LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 8 (12) : E1016 - E1024
  • [35] Economic assessment of incorporating the hexavalent vaccine as part of the National Immunization Program of Peru
    Janice Seinfeld
    María Laura Rosales
    Alfredo Sobrevilla
    Juan Guillermo López Yescas
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [36] The equity road ahead for financing non-national immunization program vaccines in China: challenges and opportunities from a qualitative study
    Jiang, Mingzhu
    Jiang, Weixi
    Yan, Xuanxuan
    Ma, Haifeng
    Zhou, Sijuan
    Ying, Xiaohua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2024, 23 (01)
  • [37] Public Preference and Priorities for Including Vaccines in China's National Immunization Program: Discrete Choice Experiment
    Zhang, Lingli
    Li, Xin
    Chen, Jiali
    Wang, Xiaoye
    Sun, Yuyang
    JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2024, 10
  • [38] Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of the human rotavirus vaccine RIX4414 (Rotarix™) oral suspension (liquid formulation) when co-administered with expanded program on immunization (EPI) vaccines in Vietnam and the Philippines in 2006-2007
    Anh, D. D.
    Carlos, C. C.
    Thiem, D. V.
    Hutagalung, Y.
    Gatchalian, S.
    Bock, H. L.
    Smolenov, I.
    Suryakiran, P. V.
    Han, H. H.
    VACCINE, 2011, 29 (11) : 2029 - 2036
  • [39] Human Rotavirus Vaccine Is Highly Efficacious When Coadministered With Routine Expanded Program of Immunization Vaccines Including Oral Poliovirus Vaccine in Latin America
    Tregnaghi, Miguel W.
    Abate, Hector J.
    Valencia, Alejandra
    Lopez, Pio
    Da Silveira, Themis Reverbel
    Rivera, Luis
    Rivera Medina, Doris Maribel
    Saez-Llorens, Xavier
    Gonzalez Ayala, Silvia Elena
    De Leon, Tirza
    Van Doorn, Leen-Jan
    Rubio, Maria Del Pilar
    Suryakiran, Pemmaraju Venkata
    Casellas, Javier M.
    Ortega-Barria, Eduardo
    Smolenov, Igor V.
    Han, Htay-Htay
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2011, 30 (06) : E103 - E108
  • [40] Whole Genome Sequence Analysis of Salmonella Typhi Isolated in Thailand before and after the Introduction of a National Immunization Program
    Dyson, Zoe A.
    Duy Pham Thanh
    Bodhidatta, Ladaporn
    Mason, Carl Jeffries
    Srijan, Apichai
    Rabaa, Maia A.
    Phat Voong Vinh
    Tuyen Ha Thanh
    Thwaites, Guy E.
    Baker, Stephen
    Holt, Kathryn E.
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2017, 11 (01):