Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

被引:6
作者
Sun, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Jian, Sha [2 ]
Peng, Bo [2 ]
Hou, Jian [2 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Clin Med, Shierqiao Campus, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Hosp Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Radiol, 39 Shierqiao Rd, Chengdu 610075, Peoples R China
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); computed tomography (CT); acute pancreatitis (AP); meta-analysis; FLUID COLLECTIONS; DIFFUSION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.21037/atm-22-812
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is characterized by acute onset, rapid development, and poor prognosis. Timely diagnosis and identification of the cause are the key to formulating the clinical program and improving the prognosis. There were several studies on this topic but the results varied. This study systematically evaluated and analyzed reports on the comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of AP in recent years, providing evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods: The databases of PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched for literature on MRI and CT in the diagnosis of AP After evaluating the artides and extracting the data, the software RevMan 5.4 and Stata 16.0 were used for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 9 articles were included in the selection, with a total of 566 patients having undergone diagnosis. Meta-analysis showed that for MRI, the diagnostic sensitivity was 92%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 85% to 96%; specificity was 74%, 95% CI: 50% to 89%; positive likelihood ratio was 3.5, 95% CI: 1.6 to 8.0; negative likelihood ratio was 0.11, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.24; diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 32, 95% CI: 7 to 136; and the area under the curve (AUC) value was 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90 to 0.95. For CT, the diagnostic sensitivity was 73%, 95% CI: 55% to 85%; specificity was 64%, 95% CI: 42% to 82%; positive likelihood ratio was 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.6; negative likelihood ratio was 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.76; DOR was 5, 95% CI: 2 to 14; and the AUC value was 0.74, 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.78. The AUC value of MRI was significantly greater than CT (Z=3.684, P=0.023). Discussion: In the diagnosis of AP, MRI is more sensitive, specific, and accurate than CT, and can be used as the first choice for the diagnosis of AP.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Endoscopic management of complications of acute pancreatitis: an update on the field
    Aghdassi, Ali
    Simon, Peter
    Pickartz, Tilman
    Budde, Christoph
    Skube, Mariya E.
    Lerch, Markus. M.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 12 (12) : 1207 - 1218
  • [2] Staging of severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging- A comparative study
    Arvanitakis, M.
    Koustiani, G.
    Gantzarou, A.
    Grollios, G.
    Tsitouridis, I.
    Haritandi-Kouridou, A.
    Dimitriadis, A.
    Arvanitakis, C.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2007, 39 (05) : 473 - 482
  • [3] Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of acute pancreatitis
    Arvanitakis, M
    Delhaye, M
    De Maertelaere, V
    Bali, M
    Winant, C
    Coppens, E
    Jeanmart, J
    Zalcman, M
    Van Gansbeke, D
    Devière, J
    Matos, C
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (03) : 715 - 723
  • [4] American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Update: Management of Pancreatic Necrosis
    Baron, Todd H.
    DiMaio, Christopher J.
    Wang, Andrew Y.
    Morgan, Katherine A.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (01) : 67 - +
  • [5] CT- and MRI-Based Assessment of Body Composition and Pancreatic Fibrosis Reveals High Incidence of Clinically Significant Metabolic Changes That Affect the Quality of Life and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer
    Bieliuniene, Edita
    Frokjaer, Jens Brondum
    Pockevicius, Alius
    Kemesiene, Jurate
    Lukosevicius, Saulius
    Basevicius, Algidas
    Atstupenaite, Vaida
    Barauskas, Giedrius
    Ignatavicius, Povilas
    Gulbinas, Antanas
    Dambrauskas, Zilvinas
    [J]. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2019, 55 (10):
  • [6] Costache M I, 2017, Curr Health Sci J, V43, P132, DOI 10.12865/CHSJ.43.02.05
  • [7] Pancreatic fluid collections: What is the ideal imaging technique?
    Dhaka, Narendra
    Samanta, Jayanta
    Kochhar, Suman
    Kalra, Navin
    Appasani, Sreekanth
    Manrai, Manish
    Kochhar, Rakesh
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (48) : 13403 - 13410
  • [8] Management of complications of acute pancreatitis
    DiMaio, Christopher J.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 34 (05) : 336 - 342
  • [9] Visualization of the heterogeneous internal structure of so-called "pancreatic necrosis" by magnetic resonance imaging in acute necrotizing pancreatitis
    Hirota, M
    Kimura, Y
    Ishiko, T
    Beppu, T
    Yamashita, Y
    Ogawa, M
    [J]. PANCREAS, 2002, 25 (01) : 63 - 67
  • [10] Ilhan M, 2017, TURK J SURG, V33, P153, DOI 10.5152/UCD.2016.3573