Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Ukraine

被引:20
|
作者
Melnitchouk, Nelya [1 ]
Soeteman, Djora I. [2 ]
Davids, Jennifer S. [3 ]
Fields, Adam [1 ]
Cohen, Joshua [4 ]
Noubary, Farzad [4 ]
Lukashenko, Andrey [5 ]
Kolesnik, Olena O. [5 ]
Freund, Karen M. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Dept Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Decis Sci, Boston, MA USA
[3] UMass Med Ctr, Worcester, MA USA
[4] Tufts Clin & Translat Sci Inst, Boston, MA USA
[5] Natl Canc Inst, Kiev, Ukraine
[6] Tufts Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[7] Tufts Univ, Sch Med Boston, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
FECAL OCCULT-BLOOD; FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY; VIRTUAL COLONOSCOPY; COLONOGRAPHY; PREVALENCE; SURVIVAL; UTILITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12962-018-0104-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and is associated with high mortality when detected at a later stage. There is a paucity of studies from low and middle income countries to support the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. We aim to analyze the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening compared to no screening in Ukraine, a lower-middle income country. Methods: We developed a deterministic Markov cohort model to assess the cost-effectiveness of three colorectal cancer screening strategies [fecal occult blood test (FOBT) every year, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FOBT every 5 years, and colonoscopy every 10 years] compared to no screening. We modeled outcomes in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime time horizon. We performed sensitivity analyses on treatment adherence, test characteristics and costs. Analyses were conducted from the perspective of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. Results: The base-case lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis showed that all three screening strategies were cost saving compared to no screening, and among the three strategies, colonoscopy every 10 years was the dominant strategy compared to no screening with standard adherence to treatment. When decreased adherence to treatment was modeled, colonoscopy every 10 years was the most cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $843 per QALY compared with no screening. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that colorectal cancer screening can save money and improve health compared to no screening in Ukraine. Colonoscopy every 10 years is superior to the other screening modalities evaluated in this study. This knowledge can be used to concentrate efforts on developing a national screening program in Ukraine.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF COLORECTAL-CANCER SCREENING IN JAPAN
    SHIMBO, T
    GLICK, H
    EISENBERG, JM
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1991, 11 (04) : 326 - 326
  • [32] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening: Selecting the ideal strategy
    Bond, JH
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 1998, 13 : S252 - S256
  • [33] Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in renal transplant recipients
    Wong, Germaine
    Howard, Kirsten
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Chapman, Jeremy R.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 85 (04) : 532 - 541
  • [34] Cost-Effectiveness of Total Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Japan
    Sekiguchi, Masau
    Matsuda, Takahisa
    Matsumoto, Minori
    Sakamoto, Taku
    Otake, Yosuke
    Nakajima, Takeshi
    Kakugawa, Yasuo
    Saito, Yutaka
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 495 - 496
  • [35] Comparing the Cost-Effectiveness of Innovative Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
    Peterse, Elisabeth F. P.
    Meester, Reinier G. S.
    de Jonge, Lucie
    Omidvari, Amir-Houshang
    Alarid-Escudero, Fernando
    Knudsen, Amy B.
    Zauber, Ann G.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2021, 113 (02): : 154 - 161
  • [36] Probabilistic Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Screening Strategies for Colorectal Cancer
    Tafazzoli, Ali
    Roberts, Stephen
    Klein, Robert
    Ness, Reid
    Dittus, Robert
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MODELING AND COMPUTER SIMULATION, 2009, 19 (02):
  • [37] Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening strategies: A systematic review
    Gheysariyeha, Fatemeh
    Rahimi, Farimah
    Tabesh, Elham
    Hemami, Mohsen Rezaei
    Adibi, Payman
    Rezayatmand, Reza
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2022, 31 (06)
  • [38] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL-CANCER IN JAPAN
    TSUJI, I
    FUKAO, A
    SHOJI, T
    KUWAJIMA, I
    SUGAWARA, N
    HISAMICHI, S
    TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1991, 164 (04): : 269 - 278
  • [39] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF COLORECTAL-CANCER SCREENING STRATEGIES
    ENGLAND, WL
    HALLS, JJ
    HUNT, VB
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1986, 6 (04) : 276 - 276
  • [40] Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in average risk individuals
    Telford, Jennifer J.
    Sambrook, Jennifer C.
    Zou, Denise
    Levy, Adrian R.
    Enns, Robert A.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) : AB368 - AB368