Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Ukraine

被引:21
作者
Melnitchouk, Nelya [1 ]
Soeteman, Djora I. [2 ]
Davids, Jennifer S. [3 ]
Fields, Adam [1 ]
Cohen, Joshua [4 ]
Noubary, Farzad [4 ]
Lukashenko, Andrey [5 ]
Kolesnik, Olena O. [5 ]
Freund, Karen M. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Dept Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Decis Sci, Boston, MA USA
[3] UMass Med Ctr, Worcester, MA USA
[4] Tufts Clin & Translat Sci Inst, Boston, MA USA
[5] Natl Canc Inst, Kiev, Ukraine
[6] Tufts Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[7] Tufts Univ, Sch Med Boston, Boston, MA 02111 USA
来源
COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION | 2018年 / 16卷
关键词
FECAL OCCULT-BLOOD; FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY; VIRTUAL COLONOSCOPY; COLONOGRAPHY; PREVALENCE; SURVIVAL; UTILITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12962-018-0104-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and is associated with high mortality when detected at a later stage. There is a paucity of studies from low and middle income countries to support the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. We aim to analyze the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening compared to no screening in Ukraine, a lower-middle income country. Methods: We developed a deterministic Markov cohort model to assess the cost-effectiveness of three colorectal cancer screening strategies [fecal occult blood test (FOBT) every year, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FOBT every 5 years, and colonoscopy every 10 years] compared to no screening. We modeled outcomes in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime time horizon. We performed sensitivity analyses on treatment adherence, test characteristics and costs. Analyses were conducted from the perspective of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. Results: The base-case lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis showed that all three screening strategies were cost saving compared to no screening, and among the three strategies, colonoscopy every 10 years was the dominant strategy compared to no screening with standard adherence to treatment. When decreased adherence to treatment was modeled, colonoscopy every 10 years was the most cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $843 per QALY compared with no screening. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that colorectal cancer screening can save money and improve health compared to no screening in Ukraine. Colonoscopy every 10 years is superior to the other screening modalities evaluated in this study. This knowledge can be used to concentrate efforts on developing a national screening program in Ukraine.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], UKRAINE
  • [2] ARMINSKI T. C., 1964, DIS COLON RECTUM, V7, P249, DOI 10.1007/BF02630528
  • [3] Accuracy of screening for fecal occult blood on a single stool sample obtained by digital rectal examination: A comparison with recommended sampling practice
    Collins, JF
    Lieberman, DA
    Durbin, TE
    Weiss, DG
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (02) : 81 - 85
  • [4] Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) - A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia
    Cotton, PB
    Durkalski, VL
    Benoit, PC
    Palesch, YY
    Mauldin, PD
    Hoffman, B
    Vining, DJ
    Small, WC
    Affronti, J
    Rex, D
    Kopecky, KK
    Ackerman, S
    Burdick, JS
    Brewington, C
    Turner, MA
    Zfass, A
    Wright, AR
    Iyer, RB
    Lynch, P
    Sivak, MV
    Butler, H
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (14): : 1713 - 1719
  • [5] Cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5-a population-based study
    De Angelis, Roberta
    Sant, Milena
    Coleman, Michel P.
    Francisci, Silvia
    Baili, Paolo
    Pierannunzio, Daniela
    Trama, Annalisa
    Visser, Otto
    Brenner, Hermann
    Ardanaz, Eva
    Bielska-Lasota, Magdalena
    Engholm, Gerda
    Nennecke, Alice
    Siesling, Sabine
    Berrino, Franco
    Capocaccia, Riccardo
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (01) : 23 - 34
  • [6] Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008
    Ferlay, Jacques
    Shin, Hai-Rim
    Bray, Freddie
    Forman, David
    Mathers, Colin
    Parkin, Donald Maxwell
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 127 (12) : 2893 - 2917
  • [7] Fitzmaurice C, 2017, JAMA ONCOL, V3, P524, DOI [10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706]
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population
    Frazier, AL
    Colditz, GA
    Fuchs, CS
    Kuntz, KM
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (15): : 1954 - 1961
  • [9] Greenberg PD, 2000, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V95, P1331
  • [10] Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population
    Imperiale, TF
    Ransohoff, DF
    Itzkowitz, SH
    Turnbull, BA
    Ross, ME
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (26) : 2704 - 2714