Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Ukraine

被引:20
|
作者
Melnitchouk, Nelya [1 ]
Soeteman, Djora I. [2 ]
Davids, Jennifer S. [3 ]
Fields, Adam [1 ]
Cohen, Joshua [4 ]
Noubary, Farzad [4 ]
Lukashenko, Andrey [5 ]
Kolesnik, Olena O. [5 ]
Freund, Karen M. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Dept Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Decis Sci, Boston, MA USA
[3] UMass Med Ctr, Worcester, MA USA
[4] Tufts Clin & Translat Sci Inst, Boston, MA USA
[5] Natl Canc Inst, Kiev, Ukraine
[6] Tufts Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[7] Tufts Univ, Sch Med Boston, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
FECAL OCCULT-BLOOD; FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY; VIRTUAL COLONOSCOPY; COLONOGRAPHY; PREVALENCE; SURVIVAL; UTILITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12962-018-0104-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and is associated with high mortality when detected at a later stage. There is a paucity of studies from low and middle income countries to support the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. We aim to analyze the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening compared to no screening in Ukraine, a lower-middle income country. Methods: We developed a deterministic Markov cohort model to assess the cost-effectiveness of three colorectal cancer screening strategies [fecal occult blood test (FOBT) every year, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FOBT every 5 years, and colonoscopy every 10 years] compared to no screening. We modeled outcomes in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime time horizon. We performed sensitivity analyses on treatment adherence, test characteristics and costs. Analyses were conducted from the perspective of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. Results: The base-case lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis showed that all three screening strategies were cost saving compared to no screening, and among the three strategies, colonoscopy every 10 years was the dominant strategy compared to no screening with standard adherence to treatment. When decreased adherence to treatment was modeled, colonoscopy every 10 years was the most cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $843 per QALY compared with no screening. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that colorectal cancer screening can save money and improve health compared to no screening in Ukraine. Colonoscopy every 10 years is superior to the other screening modalities evaluated in this study. This knowledge can be used to concentrate efforts on developing a national screening program in Ukraine.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Ukraine
    Nelya Melnitchouk
    Djøra I. Soeteman
    Jennifer S. Davids
    Adam Fields
    Joshua Cohen
    Farzad Noubary
    Andrey Lukashenko
    Olena O. Kolesnik
    Karen M. Freund
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 16
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer
    Budenholzer, B
    Welch, HG
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 135 (03) : 219 - 219
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Knudsen, Amy B.
    Brenner, Hermann
    EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2011, 33 (01) : 88 - 100
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening
    Heresbach, D
    Manfrédi, S
    Branger, B
    Bretagne, JF
    GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2006, 30 (01): : 44 - 58
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of colorectal Cancer Screening
    Sailer, M.
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2012, 34 (06) : 441 - 442
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening
    Glick, SN
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (04): : 407 - 408
  • [7] The cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer
    Telford, Jennifer J.
    Levy, Adrian R.
    Sambrook, Jennifer C.
    Zou, Denise
    Enns, Robert A.
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (12) : 1307 - 1313
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening
    McMahon, PM
    Bosch, JL
    Gleason, S
    Halpern, EF
    Lester, JS
    Gazelle, GS
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening - An overview
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Knudsen, Amy B.
    Brenner, Hermann
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 24 (04) : 439 - 449
  • [10] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING IN THE ELDERLY
    Vijan, S.
    Lewis, C.
    Deleon, C.
    Pignone, M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 24 : 49 - 50