An Interrelated Decision-Making Model for an Intelligent Decision Support System in Healthcare

被引:6
|
作者
Mahiddin, Normadiah [1 ]
Othman, Zulaiha Ali [1 ]
Abu Bakar, Azuraliza [1 ]
Rahim, Nur Arzuar Abdul [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Informat Sci & Technol, Ctr Artificial Intelligence Technol CAIT, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
[2] Univ Sains Malaysia, Dept Clin Med, Adv Med & Dent Inst, Kepala Batas 13200, Penang, Malaysia
关键词
Medical services; Decision support systems; Decision making; Spread spectrum communication; Diseases; Information management; Data mining; Healthcare; diabetes; data mining; decision support system; decision-making; DIAGNOSIS; CLASSIFICATION; ARCHITECTURE; PREDICTION; ANALYTICS; PAIN; B40;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3160725
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The nature of decision making in healthcare is complex and crucial. It is essential to have a tool that helps with accurate and correct decisions based on real-time data. Moreover, the healthcare process itself is complex, comprising various stages from primary to palliative, closely related to each other, and the process is different depending on the type of disease. Each stage has a crucial decision to be made relying on other stages' decisions. Thus, an intelligent decision support system (IDSS) model based on a data mining approach becomes a prominent solution. However, the existing IDSS and Group Decision Support System (GDSS) applied a single-stage approach and primarily focused on development at a certain stage for specific outcomes. In contrast, the nature of healthcare decision-making in each stage is related to the previous stages, which change dynamically. Therefore, this paper proposes an interrelated decision-making model (IDM) for IDSS in healthcare that aims to have an effective decision by utilizing knowledge from previous and following treatment stages known as IDM-IDSS-healthcare. The experiment was conducted using simulated diabetes treatments data that were validated by the medical expert. Eight data sets with distinct sizes were constructed and classified into two types of decision-making categories. Each data sets consists of primary and secondary care stages with a range of 25 to 58 attributes and 300-11,000 instances. The experiment results show algorithms J48, Logistic, NaiveBayes Updateable, RandomTree, BayesNet and AdaBoostM1 obtained the best accuracy in sequence from 46% to 99%. The result also shows the improvement of decision-making efficiency with the prediction model accuracy has increased up to 56%. In addition, all respondents agreed in a focus-group discussion with medical and information technology (IT) experts that the proposed IDM-IDSS-healthcare is practical as a healthcare solution. Moreover, the solution for the development of IDM-IDSS-healthcare should use the multi-agent approach.
引用
收藏
页码:31660 / 31676
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Unremarkable AI: Fitting Intelligent Decision Support into Critical, Clinical Decision-Making Processes
    Yang, Qian
    Steinfeld, Aaron
    Zimmerman, John
    CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [12] Situation Calculus Application in Tasks of Intelligent Decision-Making Support
    Massel, Liudmila
    Kuzmin, Vladimir
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 3RD RUSSIAN-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS (RPC), 2018,
  • [13] An Experimental Study of Executive Decision-Making With Implications for Decision Support
    Ow, Terence T.
    Morris, James G.
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL COMPUTING AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2010, 20 (04) : 370 - 397
  • [14] Safeguarding Intelligent Decision-Making for Business : Towards A Model
    Bhattacharya, Prithvi
    2020 19TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM INFOTEH-JAHORINA (INFOTEH), 2020,
  • [15] Decision-Making Intelligent System for Passenger of Urban Transports
    Wences, Pedro
    Martinez, Alicia
    Estrada, Hugo
    Gonzalez, Miguel
    UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING AND AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE, UCAMI 2017, 2017, 10586 : 128 - 139
  • [16] Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners
    Lill, Jordan D.
    Shriver, Mark D.
    Allen, Keith D.
    BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IN PRACTICE, 2021, 14 (04) : 1144 - 1156
  • [17] Systematic AI Support for Decision-Making in the Healthcare Sector: Obstacles and Success Factors
    Bertl, Markus
    Ross, Peeter
    Draheim, Dirk
    HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 12 (03)
  • [18] Decision-Making in Healthcare. A Bibliometric Exploration
    Olariu, Ana Alexandra
    Breazu, Andreea
    Popa, Stefan Catalin
    Popa, Catalina Florentina
    Caruceru, Nicoleta
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2024, 18 (01): : 3242 - 3254
  • [19] The decision partner in healthcare decision-making: A concept analysis
    Gray, Tamryn F.
    Nolan, Marie T.
    Clayman, Marla L.
    Wenzel, Jennifer A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2019, 92 : 79 - 89
  • [20] A Validation of an Intelligent Decision-Making Support System for the Nutrition Diagnosis of Bariatric Surgery Patients
    Cruz, Magda R. R.
    Martins, Cristina
    Dias, Joao
    Pinto, Jose S.
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 2 (02) : 52 - 57