Comparison of Chinese and international psychiatrists' views on classification of mental disorders

被引:14
作者
Dai, Yunfei [1 ]
Yu, Xin [2 ,3 ]
Xiao, Zeping [1 ]
Xu, Yifeng [1 ]
Zhao, Min [1 ]
Correia, Joao Mendonca [4 ,5 ]
Maj, Mario [6 ]
Reed, Geoffrey M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Mental Hlth Ctr, Sch Med, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Inst Mental Hlth, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Hlth, Key Lab Mental Hlth, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] WHO, Dept Mental Hlth & Substance Abuse, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Maastricht Univ, Dept Cognit Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Naples Federico II, SUN, Dept Psychiat, Naples, Italy
关键词
classification; cross-cultural applicability; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM); International Classification of Diseases (ICD); mental disorder; DSM-IV; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1111/appy.12146
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
IntroductionThis study aimed to explore the views and attitudes of Chinese psychiatrists on mental disorders classification, and to compare their similarities and differences with those of the international mental health professionals. MethodsTwo hundred and ninety members of the Chinese Society of Psychiatry were invited to participate in the study and 211 completed the survey. ResultsNinety-one percent of Chinese participants regularly used a formal classification system, with more users of the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10; 48.8%) or Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders 3rd Edition (39.3%) than the 4th Edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (11.4%). Like their global counterparts, Chinese respondents regarded communication among clinicians as the most important purpose of a classification and preferred a simpler system with fewer categories. Chinese psychiatrists were more likely than international participants to prefer a system with strict diagnostic criteria for all disorders and to endorse problems with a cultural applicability of the classification. However, only a minority (31.3%) indicated that they saw a need for a national classification. DiscussionOverall, Chinese psychiatrists have similar opinions and attitudes on most issues of the classification to the international clinicians. Areas of divergent views may provide meaningful information for ICD revision in China.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 273
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Nurses' views on current and future systems for classification of psychiatric disorders [J].
Aitchison, Rachael ;
Mellsop, Graham .
ASIA-PACIFIC PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 2 (02) :85-91
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[3]  
[Anonymous], ADV PSYCHIAT TREAT, DOI 10.1192/apt.bp.109.007138
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, COMMUN DIS REP CDR W
[5]   American Association of Community Psychiatrists' views on general features of DSM-IV [J].
Bell, Carl C. ;
Sowers, Wesley ;
Thompson, Kenneth S. .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2008, 59 (06) :687-689
[6]  
Chen Y. F., 2005, NERV DIS MENT HLTH, V5, P83
[7]   Chinese classification of mental disorders (CCMD-3): Towards integration in international classification [J].
Chen, YF .
PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2002, 35 (2-3) :171-175
[8]  
*CHIN SOC NEUR PSY, 1985, CHINESE J NEUROLOGY, V18, P314
[9]  
Int Advisory Grp Revision ICD-10, 2011, WORLD PSYCHIATRY, V10, P86
[10]   From diversity to unity - The classification of mental disorders in 21st-century China [J].
Lee, S .
PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 24 (03) :421-+