Comparing the environmental impact of inhalational anaesthesia and propofol-based intravenous anaesthesia

被引：31

作者：

Allen, C. ^{[1
]}

Baxter, I. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Freeman Rd Hosp, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England

来源：

关键词：

EMISSIONS;

D O I：

10.1111/anae.15356

中图分类号：

R614 [麻醉学];

学科分类号：

100217 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：862 / 863

页数：2

共 6 条

[1]

Berners-Lee M., 2020, How Bad are Bananas? The Carbon Footprint of Everything

[2]

Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, 2011, GUID DEFRA DECCS GHG

[3]

Lawson C, 2019, ANAESTHESIA, V74, P58

Parvatker, Abhijeet G. ;

Tunceroglu, Huseyin ;

Sherman, Jodi D. ;

Coish, Philip ;

Anastas, Paul ;

Zimmerman, Julie B. ;

Eckelman, Matthew J. .

[5] Abandoning inhalational anaesthesia [J].

Tapley, P. ;

Patel, M. ;

Slingo, M. .

[6] Abandoning inhalational anaesthesia [J].

White, S. M. ;

Shelton, C. L. .