Influence of Culture on Ethical Decision Making in Psychology

被引:12
作者
Zheng, Ping [1 ]
Gray, Matt J. [1 ]
Zhu, Wen-Zhen [2 ]
Jiang, Guang-Rong [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Dept Psychol, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[2] Cent China Normal Univ, Dept Psychol, Hubei Prov Key Lab Human Dev & Mental Hlth, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
American; Chinese; rule consequentialism; state consequentialism; ethics in psychology; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1080/10508422.2014.891075
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study focused on the influence of American and Chinese cultures on consequentialism orientation in decision-making within the broader context of psychologists' academic roles and responsibilities. In addition, this study hypothesized that educational level would affect culturally influenced ethical decision making in both cultures. Based on the American Psychological Association Ethics Code, 20 ethical scenarios in 5 domains in psychology were created and used to examine the influence of culturally ethical beliefs on psychologists' decision making among 181 participants. The results indicated that significant cultural differences in consequentialism orientation differentiated Chinese and American participants and influenced their resolution of ethical issues.
引用
收藏
页码:510 / 522
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
American Psychological Association, 2013, GRAD STUD PSYCH
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ETH PRINC PSYCH COD
[3]  
Campbell L., 2010, APA ethics code: Commentary and case illustrations
[4]  
Darwall StephenL., 2003, CONSEQUENTIALISM
[5]  
Geddes E., 2009, Learning in Health and Social Care, V8, P92, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1473-6861.2008.00205.X
[6]  
Goodman C, 2008, PHILOS EAST WEST, V58, P17
[7]   Confucian states and learning life: making scholar-officials and social learning a political contestation [J].
Han, SoongHee .
COMPARATIVE EDUCATION, 2013, 49 (01) :57-71
[8]  
Hooker Brad., 2000, Ideal Code, Real World
[9]  
Ivanhoe PJ, 2005, BLACKW COMPAN RELIG, P374
[10]   Rule Consequentialism and Scope [J].
Kahn, Leonard .
ETHICAL THEORY AND MORAL PRACTICE, 2012, 15 (05) :631-646