The effect of low-mobile foot posture on multi-segment medial foot model gait kinematics

被引:35
作者
Cobb, Stephen C. [1 ]
Tis, Laurie L. [2 ]
Johnson, Jeffrey T. [3 ]
Wang, Yong 'Tai' [4 ]
Geil, Mark D. [5 ]
McCarty, Frances A. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Human Movement Sci, Athlet Training Educ Program, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[2] Kennesaw State Univ, Wellstar Coll Hlth & Human Serv, Kennesaw, GA USA
[3] Univ W Georgia, Dept Phys Educ & Recreat, Carrollton, GA USA
[4] Georgia State Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[5] Georgia State Univ, Dept Kinesiol & Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[6] Georgia State Univ, Inst Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
CAST; Foot structure; In vivo; Pronation; Walking; STANCE PHASE; ARCH HEIGHT; WALKING; RUNNERS; MOTION; ANKLE; REPEATABILITY; RELIABILITY; POSITION; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.06.005
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
A number of in vitro, invasive in vivo, and non-invasive marker based multi-segment foot models (MSFMs) have reported significant motion in the articulations distal to the calcaneus during gait. Few studies, however, have applied a MSFM to the investigation of the effect of foot posture on gait kinematics. Differences in stance phase kinematics between participants with low-mobile (LMF)(n = 11) versus "typical" (TYPF) (n = 11) foot postures were investigated using a multi-segment medial foot model. Three-dimensional position and stance phase excursions of four functional articulations (rearfoot complex [RC], calcaneonavicular complex [CNC], medial forefoot, first metatarsophalangeal complex) were quantified using an eight optical camera motion analysis system (Vicon Motus, Vicon Motions Systems, Centennial, CO) and a custom written software program (Matlab 7.0.1, The MathWorks, Natick, MA), respectively. Excursions during four subphases of stance phase (loading response, midstance, terminal stance, pre-swing) at each of the functional articulations were compared using multivariate analyses of variance (alpha <= 0.05). Results revealed significantly decreased LMF group CNC abduction excursion (p = 0.047) during midstance. During pre-swing, LMF group RC inversion excursion was significantly increased (p = 0.032) and eversion excursion was significantly decreased (p = 0.003) compared to the TYPF group. When these differences are considered in conjunction with the kinematic patterns of other foot/leg segments and functional articulations, the changes may suggest dysfunction of normal leg-calcaneus coupling and the constrained tarsal mechanism associated with low-mobile foot postures. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 339
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, GAIT ANAL NORMAL PAT
[2]  
Benink R J, 1985, Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, V215, P1
[3]   GAIT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY [J].
CAPPOZZO, A .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 3 (1-2) :27-50
[4]   CONSISTENCY OF VISUAL ASSESSMENTS OF ARCH HEIGHT AMONG CLINICIAN [J].
COWAN, DN ;
ROBINSON, JR ;
JONES, BH ;
POLLY, DW ;
BERREY, BH .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 15 (04) :213-217
[5]   Reliability of the foot posture index and traditional measures of foot position [J].
Evans, AM ;
Copper, AW ;
Scharfbillig, RW ;
Scutter, SD ;
Williams, MT .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 93 (03) :203-213
[6]   A JOINT COORDINATE SYSTEM FOR THE CLINICAL DESCRIPTION OF 3-DIMENSIONAL MOTIONS - APPLICATION TO THE KNEE [J].
GROOD, ES ;
SUNTAY, WJ .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1983, 105 (02) :136-144
[7]  
HICKS JH, 1953, J ANAT, V87, P345
[8]   Subtalar neutral position as an offset for a kinematic model of the foot during walking [J].
Houck, Jeff R. ;
Tome, Josh M. ;
Nawoczenski, Deborah A. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2008, 28 (01) :29-37
[9]   Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking [J].
Hunt, AE ;
Smith, RM .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2004, 19 (04) :391-397
[10]   Inter-segment foot motion and ground reaction forces over the stance phase of walking [J].
Hunt, AE ;
Smith, RM ;
Torode, M ;
Keenan, AM .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 16 (07) :592-600