ANALYSIS OF LYMPH NODE TUMOR FEATURES IN PET/CT FOR SEGMENTATION

被引:1
作者
Cabrera, D. L. Farfan [1 ,2 ]
Grossiord, E. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Gogin, N. [2 ]
Papathanassiou, D. [1 ,6 ]
Passat, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reims, CReSTIC EA 3804, F-51097 Reims, France
[2] Gen Elect Healthcare, Buc, France
[3] UMR CNRS 5219, IMT, F-31062 Toulouse 9, France
[4] 3IA ANITI, F-31062 Toulouse 9, France
[5] Univ Toulouse, F-31062 Toulouse 9, France
[6] Inst Jean Godinot, Reims, France
来源
2021 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI) | 2021年
关键词
PET/CT; breast cancer; lymph nodes; tumor segmentation; region-based features; feature analysis; Random Forest; U-Net; component-tree; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1109/ISBI48211.2021.9433791
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In the context of breast cancer, the detection and segmentation of cancerous lymph nodes in PET/CT imaging is of crucial importance. in particular for staging issues. In order to guide such image analysis procedures, some dedicated descriptors can be considered, especially region-based features. In this article, we focus on the issue of choosing which features should be embedded for lymph node tumor segmentation from PET/CT. This study is divided into two steps. We first investigate the relevance of various features by considering a Random Forest framework. In a second time, we validate the expected relevance of the best scored features by involving them in a U-Net segmentation architecture. We handle the region-based definition of these features thanks to a hierarchical modeling of the PET images. This analysis emphasizes a set of features that can significantly improve / guide the segmentation of lymph nodes in PET/CT.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 592
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Barbu A, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6361, P28
[2]   Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer [J].
Bejnordi, Babak Ehteshami ;
Veta, Mitko ;
van Diest, Paul Johannes ;
van Ginneken, Bram ;
Karssemeijer, Nico ;
Litjens, Geert ;
van der Laak, Jeroen A. W. M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (22) :2199-2210
[3]   Attribute openings, thinnings, and granulometries [J].
Breen, EJ ;
Jones, R .
COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 1996, 64 (03) :377-389
[4]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[5]   A Comparative Review of Component Tree Computation Algorithms [J].
Carlinet, Edwin ;
Geraud, Thierry .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2014, 23 (09) :3885-3895
[6]   SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique [J].
Chawla, Nitesh V. ;
Bowyer, Kevin W. ;
Hall, Lawrence O. ;
Kegelmeyer, W. Philip .
2002, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (16)
[7]   Filtering and segmentation of 3D angiographic data: Advances based on mathematical morphology [J].
Dufour, A. ;
Tankyevych, O. ;
Naegel, B. ;
Talbot, H. ;
Ronse, C. ;
Baruthio, J. ;
Dokladal, P. ;
Passat, N. .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2013, 17 (02) :147-164
[8]  
Farfan Cabrera D. L., 2020, ICPR
[9]   A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images [J].
Foster, Brent ;
Bagci, Ulas ;
Mansoor, Awais ;
Xu, Ziyue ;
Mollura, Daniel J. .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2014, 50 :76-96
[10]  
Grossiord É, 2015, I S BIOMED IMAGING, P1118, DOI 10.1109/ISBI.2015.7164068