Transforming the Morbidity and Mortality Conference to Promote Safety and Quality in a PICU

被引:33
作者
Cifra, Christina L. [1 ]
Bembea, Melania M. [2 ]
Fackler, James C. [2 ]
Miller, Marlene R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
patient care team; patient safety; pediatric intensive care unit; quality improvement; medical errors; INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS; ADVERSE EVENTS; TOOL; IMPROVEMENT; CULTURE; DEFECTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/PCC.0000000000000539
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Determine the effectiveness of a structured systems-oriented morbidity and mortality conference in improving the process of reviewing and responding to adverse events in a PICU. Design: Prospective time series analysis before and after implementation of a systems-oriented morbidity and mortality conference. Setting: Single tertiary referral PICU in Baltimore, MD. Patients: Thirty-three patients discussed before and 31 patients after implementation of a systems-oriented morbidity and mortality conference over a total of 20 morbidity and mortality conferences, from April 2013 to March 2014. Interventions: Systems-oriented morbidity and mortality conference incorporating elements of medical incident analysis. Measurements and Main Results: There was a significant increase in meeting attendance (mean, 12 vs 31 attendees per morbidity and mortality conference; p < 0.001) after the systems-oriented morbidity and mortality conference was instituted. There was no significant difference in the mean number of cases suggested (4.2 vs 4.6) or discussed (3.3 vs 3.1) per morbidity and mortality conference. There was also no significant difference in the mean number of adverse events identified per morbidity and mortality conference (3.4 vs 4.3). However, there was an increase in the proportion of cases discussed using a standard case review tool, but this did not reach statistical significance (27% vs 45%; p = 0.231). Nevertheless, we observed a significant increase in the mean number of quality improvement interventions suggested (2.4 vs 5.6; p < 0.001) and implemented (1.7 vs 4.4; p < 0.001) per morbidity and mortality conference. All adverse event categories identified had corresponding interventions suggested after the systems-oriented morbidity and mortality conference was instituted compared with before (80% vs 100%). Intervention-to-adverse event ratios per category were also higher (mean, 0.6 vs 1.5). Conclusions: A structured systems-oriented PICU morbidity and mortality conference incorporating elements of medical incident analysis improves the process of reviewing and responding to adverse events by significantly increasing quality improvement interventions suggested and implemented. Future work would involve testing locally adapted versions of the systems-oriented morbidity and mortality conference in multiple inpatient settings.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 66
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   A descriptive study of morbidity and mortality conferences and their conformity to medical incident analysis models: Results of the morbidity and mortality conference improvement study, phase 1 [J].
Aboumatar, Hanan J. ;
Blackledge, Charles G., Jr. ;
Dickson, Conan ;
Heitmiller, Eugenie ;
Freischlag, Julie ;
Pronovost, Peter J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2007, 22 (04) :232-238
[2]   Prevalence of adverse events in pediatric intensive care units in the United States [J].
Agarwal, Swati ;
Classen, David ;
Larsen, Gitte ;
Tofil, Nancy M. ;
Hayes, Leslie W. ;
Sullivan, Janice E. ;
Storgion, Stephanie A. ;
Coopes, Barbara J. ;
Craig, Vicki ;
Jaderlund, Christine ;
Bisarya, Hema ;
Parast, Layla ;
Sharek, Paul .
PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 11 (05) :568-578
[3]   Safety and Quality as a "Way of Life" in the PICU: Where Does the Morbidity and Mortality Conference Fit In? [J].
Argent, Andrew C. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (10) :2306-2308
[4]   Trying to Improve Care: The Morbidity and Mortality Conference in a Division of Rheumatology [J].
Batthish, Michelle ;
Tse, Shirley M. L. ;
Feldman, Brian M. ;
Baker, G. Ross ;
Laxer, Ronald M. .
JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 41 (12) :2452-2458
[5]  
Bechtold ML, 2007, QUAL SAF HEALTH CARE, V16, P422, DOI 10.1136/qshc.2006.021139
[6]   Learning From Defects to Enhance Morbidity and Mortality Conferences [J].
Berenholtz, Sean M. ;
Hartsell, Theresa L. ;
Pronovost, Peter J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2009, 24 (03) :192-195
[7]   The morbidity and mortality conference as an adverse event surveillance tool in a paediatric intensive care unit [J].
Cifra, Christina L. ;
Jones, Kareen L. ;
Ascenzi, Judith ;
Bhalala, Utpal S. ;
Bembea, Melania M. ;
Fackler, James C. ;
Miller, Marlene R. .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2014, 23 (11) :930-938
[8]   The Morbidity and Mortality Conference in PICUs in the United States: A National Survey [J].
Cifra, Christina L. ;
Bembea, Melania M. ;
Fackler, James C. ;
Miller, Marlene R. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (10) :2252-2257
[9]   'Global Trigger Tool' Shows That Adverse Events In Hospitals May Be Ten Times Greater Than Previously Measured [J].
Classen, David C. ;
Resar, Roger ;
Griffin, Frances ;
Federico, Frank ;
Frankel, Terri ;
Kimmel, Nancy ;
Whittington, John C. ;
Frankel, Allan ;
Seger, Andrew ;
James, Brent C. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2011, 30 (04) :581-589
[10]  
Deis J.N., 2008, Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches Culture and Redesign, V2