Comparison of adaptive linear interpolation and conventional linear interpolation for digital radiography systems

被引:8
作者
Xu, F [1 ]
Liu, H [1 ]
Wang, G [1 ]
Alford, BA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1117/1.482727
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Some large field digital radiography systems are currently under development using multiple detectors. These small size two dimension detectors are abutted together to cover a large field Physical gaps existing between adjacent defectors produce seams between the resultant subimages. In this paper, an adaptive linear interpolation algorithm was introduced for estimating missing information at the seams and was compared with conventional linear interpolation and with nonlinear interpolation. The effectiveness of the algorithms was evaluated for relative/absolute errors. Phantom images were acquired using prototype digital radiography systems. Seams with width ranging from two pixel to six pixel were introduced and adaptive linear interpolation algorithms were applied to estimate missing information at the seams. Quantitatively, the adaptive interpolation offers at least equivalent or less error than that of the linear interpolation algorithm. The experimental results prove that there is a significant difference between two algorithms for tested radiographic images. The comparison results also show that the adaptive interpolation offers better performance than nonlinear interpolation. When developing large field digital radiography imaging systems, gaps between adjacent detectors should be minimized. For narrow seams, the adaptive linear interpolation algorithm is a practical solution because of its simplicity and effectiveness. (C) 2000 SPIE and IS&T. [S1017-9909(00)00201-4].
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 31
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
CHUENG L, 1995, MED ELECT
[2]   CCD mosaic technique for large-field digital mammography [J].
Jalink, A ;
McAdoo, J ;
Halama, G ;
Liu, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1996, 15 (03) :260-267
[3]   CHARGE-COUPLED DEVICE DETECTOR - PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS AND POTENTIAL FOR SMALL-FIELD MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGING APPLICATIONS [J].
KARELLAS, A ;
HARRIS, LJ ;
LIU, H ;
DAVIS, MA ;
DORSI, CJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (04) :1015-1023
[4]   ACCEPTANCE TESTING PRONE STEREOTAXIC BREAST BIOPSY UNITS [J].
KIMMESMITH, C ;
SOLBERG, T .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (07) :1197-1201
[5]  
LIU H, 1995, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2390, P110, DOI 10.1117/12.205991
[6]  
Liu H, 1996, INT CONGR SER, V1119, P145
[7]  
LIU H, 1993, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1894, P136, DOI 10.1117/12.154943
[8]  
LIU H, UNPUB ACAD RADIOL
[9]  
ROEHRIG H, 1994, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2163, P320, DOI 10.1117/12.174269
[10]  
ROSNER B, 1995, FUNDAMENTALS BIOSTAT, P253