Esports Governance: Exploring Stakeholder Dynamics

被引:37
|
作者
Peng, Qi [1 ]
Dickson, Geoff [2 ]
Scelles, Nicolas [1 ]
Grix, Jonathan [1 ]
Brannagan, Paul Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Sport Policy Unit, Dept Econ Policy & Int Business, Manchester M15 6BH, Lancs, England
[2] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
关键词
esports; sustainability; network governance; stakeholder; power; NETWORK GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY; MANAGEMENT; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.3390/su12198270
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Esports is a rapidly growing industry. However, the unidentifiable governance structure of the industry has contributed to a number of integrity-eroding activities. By exploring esports stakeholder dynamics, this paper answers the question, "Is the esports governance model sustainable?" Data were sourced from documentation, focus groups (N = 3) and semi-structured interviews (N = 6). Thematic analysis was conducted using Nvivo. The findings suggest that (1) the current esports governance framework features some attributes of the "lead organisation-governed network", with the power residing mainly in game publishers; (2) the rising power of other stakeholders in the network seeking to address integrity issues has caused fragmentation of the esports governance framework; (3) esports governance is evolving towards a network administration organisation (NAO) model. Such evolution has a few challenges-most notably, the compliance of game publishers. Given the social impact of the integrity issues, governments should play a main role in facilitating a NAO model.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Corporate governance, stakeholder power, and executive compensation
    Thorsten Döscher
    Gunther Friedl
    OR Spectrum, 2011, 33 : 309 - 331
  • [32] Stakeholder mapping for the governance of biosecurity: a literature review
    Reed, M. S.
    Curzon, R.
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2015, 12 (01) : 15 - 38
  • [33] Corporate Governance in The Context of Interdependent Stakeholder Relationships
    Kozlowski, Rafal
    EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A 2025 VISION TO SUSTAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DURING GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2020, : 16810 - 16818
  • [34] In Search of Stakeholder Salience: Exploring Corporate Social and Sustainability Reports
    Weber, James
    Marley, Kathryn A.
    BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2012, 51 (04) : 626 - 649
  • [35] Stakeholder perspectives on barriers to landslide risk governance
    Scolobig, Anna
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2016, 81 : S27 - S43
  • [36] Corporate governance, stakeholder power, and executive compensation
    Doescher, Thorsten
    Friedl, Gunther
    OR SPECTRUM, 2011, 33 (02) : 309 - 331
  • [37] BEYOND PRIMACY: A STAKEHOLDER THEORY OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
    Stoelhorst, J. W.
    Vishwanathan, Pushpika
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 49 (01) : 107 - 134
  • [38] Exploring stakeholder engagement in mariculture development: Challenges and prospects for China
    Yu, Jinkai
    Yin, Wang
    MARINE POLICY, 2019, 103 : 84 - 90
  • [39] Exploring the challenges of energy and resources network governance
    Poocharoen, Ora-orn
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 42 : 409 - 418
  • [40] State and regional actors in complex governance systems: Exploring dynamics of international negotiations
    Panke, Diana
    Lang, Stefan
    Wiedemann, Anke
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2017, 19 (01) : 91 - 112