Esports Governance: Exploring Stakeholder Dynamics

被引:37
|
作者
Peng, Qi [1 ]
Dickson, Geoff [2 ]
Scelles, Nicolas [1 ]
Grix, Jonathan [1 ]
Brannagan, Paul Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Sport Policy Unit, Dept Econ Policy & Int Business, Manchester M15 6BH, Lancs, England
[2] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
关键词
esports; sustainability; network governance; stakeholder; power; NETWORK GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY; MANAGEMENT; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.3390/su12198270
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Esports is a rapidly growing industry. However, the unidentifiable governance structure of the industry has contributed to a number of integrity-eroding activities. By exploring esports stakeholder dynamics, this paper answers the question, "Is the esports governance model sustainable?" Data were sourced from documentation, focus groups (N = 3) and semi-structured interviews (N = 6). Thematic analysis was conducted using Nvivo. The findings suggest that (1) the current esports governance framework features some attributes of the "lead organisation-governed network", with the power residing mainly in game publishers; (2) the rising power of other stakeholders in the network seeking to address integrity issues has caused fragmentation of the esports governance framework; (3) esports governance is evolving towards a network administration organisation (NAO) model. Such evolution has a few challenges-most notably, the compliance of game publishers. Given the social impact of the integrity issues, governments should play a main role in facilitating a NAO model.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Joint management-stakeholder committees - a new path to stakeholder governance?
    Spitzeck, Heiko
    Hansen, Erik G.
    Grayson, David
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2011, 11 (05): : 560 - +
  • [22] Power Dynamics and Corporate Power in Governance Processes: Evidence From US Environmental Governance Systems
    Ba, Yuhao
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2022, 52 (03) : 206 - 220
  • [23] Nonprofit-Public Collaborations: Understanding Governance Dynamics
    Cornforth, Chris
    Hayes, John Paul
    Vangen, Siv
    NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2015, 44 (04) : 775 - 795
  • [24] Learning to understand: disentangling the outcomes of stakeholder participation in climate change governance
    Teodoro, Jose Daniel
    Prell, Christina
    SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2023, 75 : 29 - 38
  • [25] Somewhat united: primary stakeholder perspectives of the governance of schoolboy football in Ireland
    Finnegan, Laura
    McArdle, Jean
    Littlewood, Martin
    Richardson, David
    MANAGING SPORT AND LEISURE, 2018, 23 (1-2) : 48 - 69
  • [26] "Dear IOC": Considerations for the Governance, Valuation, and Evaluation of Trends and Developments in eSports
    Postma, Dees B. W.
    van Delden, Robby W.
    van Hilvoorde, Ivo M.
    FRONTIERS IN SPORTS AND ACTIVE LIVING, 2022, 4
  • [27] Governance transference and shifting capacities and expectations in multi-stakeholder initiatives
    Jarvela, Johanna
    REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2025, 19 (01) : 87 - 103
  • [28] A REVIEW OF STAKEHOLDER DYNAMICS
    Koplyay, T.
    Lloyd, D.
    Feher-Toma, E.
    Fekete-Farkas, M.
    POLISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2016, 14 (01): : 140 - 151
  • [29] ARE eSPORTS SPORTS? EXPLORING THE PRAXIC LIMITS OF COMPETITIVE VIDEO GAMES
    Bordes, Pascal
    Martinez-Santos, Raul
    LIMITE-REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA Y PSICOLOGIA, 2020, 15
  • [30] Understanding the complex power dynamics that shape collaboration and social learning in multi-stakeholder water governance
    McIlwain, Lisa
    Baird, Julia
    Baldwin, Claudia L.
    Pickering, Gary J.
    Manathunga, Catherine
    Smith, Timothy F.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2024, 29 (03):