共 50 条
Patient-Assisted Computerized Education for Recipients of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators A Randomized Controlled Trial of the PACER Program
被引:19
|作者:
Kuhl, Emily A.
[1
]
Sears, Samuel F.
[2
]
Vazquez, Lauren D.
[3
]
Conti, Jamie B.
[4
]
机构:
[1] Amer Psychiat Assoc, Div Res, Amer Psychiat Inst Res & Educ, Arlington, VA 22209 USA
[2] E Carolina Univ, Dept Clin Psychol, Greenville, NC USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Div Cardiovasc Med, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词:
cognitive-behavioral therapy;
computerized;
implantable cardioverter defibrillator;
quality of life;
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS;
PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE;
ICD PATIENTS;
INTERNET;
ANXIETY;
TECHNOLOGIES;
INTERVENTION;
RELIABILITY;
VALIDITY;
D O I:
10.1097/JCN.0b013e31819c143d
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background and Research Objective: Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are at risk for postimplant anxiety. Computerized treatments for anxiety are well supported and desirable because of accessibility, anonymity, and cost-effectiveness. However, there currently exists no computerized psychosocial treatment for ICD populations. Our objective was to evaluate whether a pilot program (patient-assisted computerized education for recipients of ICDs [PACER of ICDs]) of a computerized intervention for ICD patients would improve ICD-related knowledge and psychological outcomes versus usual care. Outcomes were also compared with those from a related study that used the same intervention but in an in-person format, Subjects and Methods: Patients (N = 30) with an ICD were randomized to PACER or usual care. Mean time from implantation was 10.71 months (SD, 21.81 months). Outcomes included ICD-related knowledge, trait anxiety, defibrillation-related anxiety, patient acceptance of the ICD, and quality of life. Patients were assessed at baseline and at 1 month follow-up, Results and Conclusions: Knowledge score over time did not differ by treatment group, although both groups improved their scores. Among treatment patients, increased knowledge accounted for a significant amount of variance in device acceptance (R(2) change = 0.30, P = .02), irrespective of age, education, ejection fraction, and time from implantation. There was no relationship between knowledge and device acceptance among control patients. Compared with previous recipients, new device recipients (< 3 months) were more likely to demonstrate an increase in knowledge (P = .01), greater defibrillation anxiety (P = .02), and worse patient acceptance (P = .04). Patient-assisted computerized education for recipients of ICDs resulted in comparable improvements in trait anxiety, quality of life, and device acceptance as the in-person treatment. The potential utility of PACER to enhance device acceptance lends support for further testing among larger samples.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 231
页数:7
相关论文