Tourism opportunities drive woodland and wildlife conservation outcomes of community-based conservation in Namibia's Zambezi region

被引:15
作者
Meyer, Maximilian [1 ]
Klingelhoeffer, Ekkehard [2 ]
Naidoo, Robin [3 ]
Wingate, Vladimir [4 ]
Boerner, Jan [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Inst Food & Resource Econ, Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Namibia, Dept Wildlife Management & Ecotourism, Katima Mulilo, Namibia
[3] World Wildlife Fund, 1250 24th St,NW, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[4] Univ Bern, Dept Geog, Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Bonn, Ctr Dev Res, Bonn, Germany
关键词
NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; COVER CHANGE; LAND-USE; IMPACTS; LIVELIHOODS; ELEPHANTS; CONSERVANCIES; DEFORESTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106863
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Initiatives to promote community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) have been evaluated with mixed results in socio-economic and ecological outcome dimensions. In Namibia, community conservancies are being established since the 1990s mainly to reconcile wildlife conservation and rural development. As Namibia gears up for participation in Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+), land use and land cover change and related biomass carbon dynamics may become increasingly important additional outcome indicators for the country's approach to CBNRM. Based on a social-ecological conceptual framework, we identify spatially heterogeneous local context factors that may drive positive and negative effects of CBNRM on vegetation cover in Namibia's Zambezi region. We test our theoretical predictions using panel data in a spatially explicit, quasi-experimental evaluation design and find that, on average, CBNRM somewhat increased elephant presence, but had a negative effect on woodland cover. Heterogeneous treatment effect analysis indicates that CBNRM does work for woodland conservation when communities are located in and around wildlife corridors, which provide tourism income opportunities. Despite success in stabilizing wildlife populations in the region, our results suggest that complementary conservation incentives may be required to make Namibia's CBNRM model fit for REDD+.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Allison Paul., 2012, Do we really need zero-inflated Models, Statistical Horizons
  • [2] Anderies JM, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Country Report
  • [4] [Anonymous], LOCAL COMMUNITIES EQ
  • [5] Large-scale impacts of herbivores on the structural diversity of African savannas
    Asner, Gregory P.
    Levick, Shaun R.
    Kennedy-Bowdoin, Ty
    Knapp, David E.
    Emerson, Ruth
    Jacobson, James
    Colgan, Matthew S.
    Martin, Roberta E.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (12) : 4947 - 4952
  • [6] Bandyopadhyay S., 2010, Communal Conservancies and Household Welfare in Namibia
  • [7] Benefits to local communities from community conservancies in Namibia: an assessment
    Bandyopadhyay, Sushenjit
    Humavindu, Michael
    Shyamsundar, Priya
    Wang, Limin
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2009, 26 (05) : 733 - 754
  • [8] Developing a theory of change for a community-based response to illegal wildlife trade
    Biggs, Duan
    Cooney, Rosie
    Roe, Dilys
    Dublin, Holly T.
    Allan, James R.
    Challender, Dan W. S.
    Skinner, Diane
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2017, 31 (01) : 5 - 12
  • [9] Titling indigenous communities protects forests in the Peruvian Amazon
    Blackman, Allen
    Corral, Leonardo
    Santos Lima, Eirivelthon
    Asner, Gregory P.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (16) : 4123 - 4128
  • [10] Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana
    Blaikie, Piers
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 34 (11) : 1942 - 1957