First accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2

被引:187
|
作者
Heavner, Thomas P. [1 ]
Donley, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Levi, Filippo [2 ]
Costanzo, Giovanni [3 ]
Parker, Thomas E. [1 ]
Shirley, Jon H. [1 ]
Ashby, Neil [1 ]
Barlow, Stephan [1 ]
Jefferts, S. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] NIST, Div Time & Frequency, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[2] INRIM, Ist Nazl Ric Metrol, I-10135 Turin, Italy
[3] Politecn Torino, I-10129 Turin, Italy
关键词
atomic clock; frequency standard; SI second; caesium; PRIMARY FREQUENCY STANDARD; DISTRIBUTED CAVITY PHASE; POWER DEPENDENCE; MAJORANA TRANSITIONS; MICROWAVE CAVITIES;
D O I
10.1088/0026-1394/51/3/174
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
We report the first accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2, a second-generation laser-cooled caesium fountain primary standard developed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) with a cryogenic (liquid nitrogen) microwave cavity and flight region. The 80K atom interrogation environment reduces the uncertainty due to the blackbody radiation shift by more than a factor of 50. Also, the Ramsey microwave cavity exhibits a high quality factor (>50 000) at this low temperature, resulting in a reduced distributed cavity phase shift. NIST-F2 has undergone many tests and improvements since we first began operation in 2008. In the last few years NIST-F2 has been compared against a NIST maser time scale and NIST-F1 (the US primary frequency standard) as part of in-house accuracy evaluations. We report the results of nine in-house comparisons since 2010 with a focus on the most recent accuracy evaluation. This paper discusses the design of the physics package, the laser and optics systems and the accuracy evaluation methods. The type B fractional uncertainty of NIST-F2 is shown to be 0.11 x 10(-15) and is dominated by microwave amplitude dependent effects. The most recent evaluation (August 2013) had a statistical (type A) fractional uncertainty of 0.44 x 10(-15).
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 182
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The NIST HumanID evaluation framework
    Micheals, RJ
    Grother, P
    Phillips, PJ
    AUDIO-AND VIDEO-BASED BIOMETRIC PERSON AUTHENTICATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 2688 : 403 - 411
  • [22] COMPARISON OF THE NIST HIGH-ACCURACY CRYOGENIC RADIOMETER AND THE NIST SCALE OF DETECTOR SPECTRAL RESPONSE
    HOUSTON, JM
    CROMER, CL
    HARDIS, JE
    LARASON, TC
    METROLOGIA, 1993, 30 (04) : 285 - 290
  • [23] Accuracy evaluation of the primary frequency standard NIST-7 (vol 38, pg 427, 2001)
    Shirley, JH
    Lee, WD
    Drullinger, RE
    METROLOGIA, 2002, 39 (01) : 123 - 123
  • [24] NIST high accuracy reference reflectometer-spectrophotometer
    Proctor, JE
    Barnes, PY
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 101 (05) : 619 - 627
  • [25] NIST traceability ensures power-meter accuracy
    Mooney, B
    O'Connor, C
    LASER FOCUS WORLD, 1999, 35 (06): : 121 - +
  • [27] The 2016 NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluation
    Sadjadi, Seyed Omid
    Kheyrkhah, Timothee
    Tong, Audrey
    Greenberg, Craig
    Reynolds, Douglas
    Singer, Elliot
    Mason, Lisa
    Hernandez-Cordero, Jaime
    18TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION (INTERSPEECH 2017), VOLS 1-6: SITUATED INTERACTION, 2017, : 1353 - 1357
  • [29] The NIST 2010 Speaker Recognition Evaluation
    Martin, Alvin F.
    Greenberg, Craig S.
    11TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION 2010 (INTERSPEECH 2010), VOLS 3 AND 4, 2010, : 2734 - 2737
  • [30] Laser pointer characterization and evaluation at NIST
    National Institute of Standards and Technology , United States
    LIA Today, 3 (18):