First accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2

被引:187
|
作者
Heavner, Thomas P. [1 ]
Donley, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Levi, Filippo [2 ]
Costanzo, Giovanni [3 ]
Parker, Thomas E. [1 ]
Shirley, Jon H. [1 ]
Ashby, Neil [1 ]
Barlow, Stephan [1 ]
Jefferts, S. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] NIST, Div Time & Frequency, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[2] INRIM, Ist Nazl Ric Metrol, I-10135 Turin, Italy
[3] Politecn Torino, I-10129 Turin, Italy
关键词
atomic clock; frequency standard; SI second; caesium; PRIMARY FREQUENCY STANDARD; DISTRIBUTED CAVITY PHASE; POWER DEPENDENCE; MAJORANA TRANSITIONS; MICROWAVE CAVITIES;
D O I
10.1088/0026-1394/51/3/174
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
We report the first accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2, a second-generation laser-cooled caesium fountain primary standard developed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) with a cryogenic (liquid nitrogen) microwave cavity and flight region. The 80K atom interrogation environment reduces the uncertainty due to the blackbody radiation shift by more than a factor of 50. Also, the Ramsey microwave cavity exhibits a high quality factor (>50 000) at this low temperature, resulting in a reduced distributed cavity phase shift. NIST-F2 has undergone many tests and improvements since we first began operation in 2008. In the last few years NIST-F2 has been compared against a NIST maser time scale and NIST-F1 (the US primary frequency standard) as part of in-house accuracy evaluations. We report the results of nine in-house comparisons since 2010 with a focus on the most recent accuracy evaluation. This paper discusses the design of the physics package, the laser and optics systems and the accuracy evaluation methods. The type B fractional uncertainty of NIST-F2 is shown to be 0.11 x 10(-15) and is dominated by microwave amplitude dependent effects. The most recent evaluation (August 2013) had a statistical (type A) fractional uncertainty of 0.44 x 10(-15).
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 182
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comment on 'First accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2'
    Gibble, Kurt
    Metrologia, 2015, 52 (01) : 163 - 166
  • [2] Comment on 'First accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2' (vol 52, pg 163, 2015)
    Gibble, Kurt
    METROLOGIA, 2016, 53 (03)
  • [3] Measurement of the Microwave Lensing shift in NIST-F1 and NIST-F2
    Jefferts, S. R.
    Hcavncr, T. P.
    Barlow, S. E.
    Ashby, N.
    8TH SYMPOSIUM ON FREQUENCY STANDARDS AND METROLOGY 2015, 2016, 723
  • [4] NIST推出新的美国时间标准NIST-F2
    楚珺尧
    中国计量, 2014, (11) : 51 - 51
  • [5] Accuracy evaluation of NIST-F1
    Jefferts, SR
    Shirley, J
    Parker, TE
    Heavner, TP
    Meekhof, DM
    Nelson, C
    Levi, F
    Costanzo, G
    De Marchi, A
    Drullinger, R
    Hollberg, L
    Lee, WD
    Walls, FL
    METROLOGIA, 2002, 39 (04) : 321 - 336
  • [6] THE ACCURACY EVALUATION OF NIST-7
    LEE, WD
    SHIRLEY, JH
    LOWE, JP
    DRULLINGER, RE
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 1995, 44 (02) : 120 - 123
  • [7] NIST-F1: recent improvements and accuracy evaluations
    Heavner, TP
    Jefferts, SR
    Donley, EA
    Shirley, JH
    Parker, TE
    METROLOGIA, 2005, 42 (05) : 411 - 422
  • [8] NIST F1 AND F2
    Heavner, T. P.
    Parker, T. E.
    Shirley, J. H.
    Jefferts, S. R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH SYMPOSIUM FREQUENCY STANDARDS AND METROLOGY, 2009, : 299 - 307
  • [9] Accuracy evaluation of a cesium fountain primary frequency standard at NIST
    Meekhof, DM
    Jefferts, SR
    Stepanovíc, M
    Parker, TE
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2001, 50 (02) : 507 - 509
  • [10] Accuracy evaluation of the primary frequency standard NIST-7
    Shirley, JH
    Lee, WD
    Drullinger, RE
    METROLOGIA, 2001, 38 (05) : 427 - 458