Early sac shrinkage predicts a low risk of late complications after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

被引:104
作者
Goncalves, F. Bastos [1 ,3 ]
Baderkhan, H. [4 ,5 ]
Verhagen, H. J. M. [1 ]
Wanhainen, A. [4 ]
Bjorck, M. [4 ]
Stolker, R. J. [2 ]
Hoeks, S. E. [2 ]
Mani, K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Vasc Surg, NL-3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, NL-3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Ctr Hosp Lisboa Cent, Hosp Santa Marta, Dept Angiol & Vasc Surg, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[5] Gavle Cty Hosp, Dept Surg, Gavle, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
ENDOLUMINAL EXCLUSION; FOLLOW-UP; SURVEILLANCE; METAANALYSIS; UK;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.9516
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Aneurysm shrinkage has been proposed as a marker of successful endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Patients with early postoperative shrinkage may experience fewer subsequent complications, and consequently require less intensive surveillance. Methods: Patients undergoing EVAR from 2000 to 2011 at three vascular centres (in 2 countries), who had two imaging examinations (postoperative and after 6-18 months), were included. Maximum diameter, complications and secondary interventions during follow-up were registered. Patients were categorized according to early sac dynamics. The primary endpoint was freedom from late complications. Secondary endpoints were freedom from secondary intervention, postimplant rupture and direct (type I/III) endoleaks. Results: Some 597 EVARs (71.1 per cent of all EVARs) were included. No shrinkage was observed in 284 patients (47.6 per cent), moderate shrinkage (5-9mm) in 142 (23.8 per cent) and major shrinkage (at least 10mm) in 171 patients (28.6 per cent). Four years after the index imaging, the rate of freedom from complications was 84.3 (95 per cent confidence interval 78.7 to 89.8), 88.1 (80.6 to 95.5) and 94.4 (90.1 to 98.7) per cent respectively. No shrinkage was an independent risk factor for late complications compared with major shrinkage (hazard ratio (HR) 3.11; P < 0.001). Moderate compared with major shrinkage (HR 2.10; P = 0.022), early postoperative complications (HR 3.34; P < 0.001) and increasing abdominal aortic aneurysm baseline diameter (HR 1.02; P = 0.001) were also risk factors for late complications. Freedom from secondary interventions and direct endoleaks was greater for patients with major sac shrinkage. Conclusion: Early change in aneurysm sac diameter is a strong predictor of late complications after EVAR. Patients with major sac shrinkage have a very low risk of complications for up to 5 years. This parameter may be used to tailor postoperative surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:802 / 810
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Chaikof, EL ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Harris, PL ;
White, GH ;
Zarins, CK ;
Bernhard, VM ;
Matsumura, JS ;
May, J ;
Veith, FJ ;
Fillinger, MF ;
Rutherford, RB ;
Kent, KC .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) :1048-1060
[2]   Effect of Stentgraft Model on Aneurysm Shrinkage in 1,450 Endovascular Aortic Repairs [J].
Cieri, E. ;
De Rango, P. ;
Isernia, G. ;
Simonte, G. ;
Verzini, F. ;
Parlani, G. ;
Ciucci, A. ;
Cao, P. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 46 (02) :192-200
[3]   Is There a Benefit of Frequent CT Follow-up After EVAR? [J].
Dias, N. V. ;
Riva, L. ;
Ivancev, K. ;
Resch, T. ;
Sonesson, B. ;
Malina, M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 37 (04) :425-430
[4]   Adequate seal and no endoleak on the first postoperative computed tomography angiography as criteria for no additional imaging up to 5 years after endovascular aneurysm repair [J].
Goncalves, Frederico Bastos ;
van de Luijtgaarden, Koen M. ;
Hoeks, Sanne E. ;
Hendriks, Johanna M. ;
ten Raa, Sander ;
Rouwet, Ellen V. ;
Stolker, Robert J. ;
Verhagen, Hence J. M. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (06) :1503-1511
[5]   Significant sac retraction after endovascular aneurysm repair is a robust indicator of durable treatment success [J].
Houbballah, Rabih ;
Majewski, Marek ;
Becquemin, Jean-Pierre .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 52 (04) :878-883
[6]   Heterogeneity in Surveillance after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in the UK [J].
Karthikesalingam, A. ;
Page, A. A. ;
Pettengell, C. ;
Hinchliffe, R. J. ;
Loftus, I. M. ;
Thompson, M. M. ;
Holt, P. J. E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 42 (05) :585-590
[7]   Reimbursement of long-term postplacement costs after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Kim, Jason K. ;
Tonnessen, Britt H. ;
Noll, Robert E., Jr. ;
Money, Samuel R. ;
Sternbergh, W. Charles, III .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 48 (06) :1390-1395
[8]   Meta-analysis: Serum creatinine changes following contrast enhanced CT imaging [J].
Kooiman, Judith ;
Pasha, Sharif M. ;
Zondag, Wendy ;
Sijpkens, Yvo W. J. ;
van der Molen, Aart J. ;
Huisman, Menno V. ;
Dekkers, Olaf M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (10) :2554-2561
[9]   Volume regression of abdominal aortic aneurysms and its relation to successful endoluminal exclusion [J].
Lee, JT ;
Aziz, IN ;
Lee, JT ;
Haukoos, JS ;
Donayre, CE ;
Walot, I ;
Kopchok, GE ;
Lippmann, M ;
White, RA .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 38 (06) :1254-1263
[10]   Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Nine Countries 2005-2009: A Vascunet Report [J].
Mani, K. ;
Lees, T. ;
Beiles, B. ;
Jensen, L. P. ;
Venermo, M. ;
Simo, G. ;
Palombo, D. ;
Halbakken, E. ;
Troeng, T. ;
Wigger, P. ;
Bjorck, M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 42 (05) :598-607