Predictors of changes in health status between and within patients 12 months post left ventricular assist device implantation

被引:24
|
作者
Brouwers, Corline [1 ]
de Jonge, Nicolaas [2 ]
Caliskan, Kadir [3 ]
Manintveld, Olivier [3 ]
Young, Quincy-Robyn [4 ]
Kaan, Annemarie [4 ]
Kealy, Jennifer [4 ]
Denollet, Johan [1 ]
Pedersen, Susanne S. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, CoRPS Ctr Res Psychol Somat Dis, Dept Med & Clin Psychol, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr, Div Heart & Lung, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Cardiol, Thoraxctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] St Pauls Hosp, Ctr Heart, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
[5] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Psychol, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
[6] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
关键词
(end-stage) Heart failure; LVAD; Health status; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER; CONTINUOUS-FLOW; HEART-FAILURE; DESTINATION THERAPY; OUTCOMES; QUESTIONNAIRE; DEPRESSION; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1002/ejhf.75
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Improving patient-reported outcomes (e.g. health status) has become an important goal in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy, in addition to reducing mortality and morbidity. We examined predictors of changes in health status scores between and within patients 12 months post LVAD implantation. Methods Health status [Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ); Short-Form 12 (SF-12)] were assessed at 3-4 weeks after implantation, and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow up in 54 LVAD patients (74% men; mean age 54 +/- 9 years). Results Patients experienced significant improvements in health status between baseline and 3 months follow-up as assessed by the KCCQ (clinical summary score: F = 33.49, P < 0.001; overall summary score: F = 31.13, P < 0.001) and the SF-12 (physical component score: F = 31.59, P < 0.001; mental component score: F = 21.77, P < 0.001), but not between 3 months and 12 months follow-up (P > 0.05 for all). Higher scores on anxiety and depression over time, older age, lower ejection fraction, and more co-morbidity were associated with poorer health status scores on one or both of the KCCQ and SF-12 subscales. The majority of the between-patient variance of the mental component summary scores (82.6%), but not the KCCQ overall summary score (41.9%), KCCQ clinical summary score (36.2%) and physical component summary scores (23.2%), was explained by the sociodemographic, clinical and psychological factors. Conclusion The majority of LVAD patients show a significant improvement in health status after LVAD implantation. However, there are large differences in individual health status score trajectories which are only partly explained by measures of disease severity pre-LVAD, co-morbidity and psychological stress.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 573
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Isolated left ventricular assist device implantation produces variable changes to patient body mass index
    Chandratre, Sonal R.
    Smith, Nathan J.
    Walsh, Richard W.
    Kindel, Tammy L.
    Sundararajan, Sakthi K.
    Joyce, David L.
    Mohammed, Asim
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2022, 46 (08) : 1597 - 1607
  • [22] A preliminary investigation of symptom pattern and prevalence before and up to 6 months after implantation of a left ventricular assist device
    Casida, Jesus M.
    Parker, Jessica
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2012, 15 (02) : 211 - 214
  • [23] Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Predictors, Management, and Device Utilization
    Mangi, Abeel A.
    CARDIOLOGY CLINICS, 2011, 29 (04) : 629 - +
  • [24] Mental health and demographic correlates of loneliness after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Griffin, Sarah C.
    Eshera, Yasmine M.
    Burker, Eileen J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2021, 44 (12) : 1039 - 1043
  • [25] Pulmonary function assessment post-left ventricular assist device implantation
    Sajgalik, Pavol
    Kim, Chul-Ho
    Stulak, John M.
    Kushwaha, Sudhir S.
    Maltais, Simon
    Joyce, David L.
    Joyce, Lyle D.
    Johnson, Bruce D.
    Schirger, John A.
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2019, 6 (01): : 53 - 61
  • [26] Sympathetic Markers are Different Between Clinical Responders and Nonresponders After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Denfeld, Quin E.
    Lee, Christopher S.
    Woodward, William R.
    Hiatt, Shirin O.
    Mudd, James O.
    Habecker, Beth A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2019, 34 (04) : E1 - E10
  • [27] Left ventricular assist device implantation in patients after left ventricular reconstruction
    Palmen, Meindert
    Braun, Jerry
    Beeres, Saskia L. M. A.
    Klautz, Robert J. M.
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 23 (06) : 979 - 981
  • [28] Preoperative predictors and outcomes of right ventricular assist device implantation after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation
    Patil, Nikhil Prakash
    Mohite, Prashant N.
    Sabashnikov, Anton
    Dhar, Dhruva
    Weymann, Alexander
    Zeriouh, Mohamed
    Hards, Rachel
    Hedger, Michael
    De Robertis, Fabio
    Bahrami, Toufan
    Amrani, Mohamed
    Rahman-Haley, Shelley
    Banner, Nicholas R.
    Popov, Aron Frederik
    Simon, Andre Ruediger
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 150 (06) : 1651 - 1658
  • [29] Preoperative hemodynamics as predictors of right heart failure post-left ventricular assist device
    Orozco-Hernandez, Erik J.
    DeLay, T. Kurt, Jr.
    Hoopes, Charles W.
    Gongora, Enrique
    Pamboukian, Salpy
    Xie, Rongbing
    Davies, James E.
    Vardas, Panos N.
    CARDIOTHORACIC SURGEON, 2022, 30 (01)
  • [30] Echocardiographic Predictors of Adverse Outcomes After Continuous Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Topilsky, Yan
    Oh, Jae K.
    Shah, Dipesh K.
    Boilson, Barry A.
    Schirger, John A.
    Kushwaha, Sudhir S.
    Pereira, Naveen L.
    Park, Soon J.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2011, 4 (03) : 211 - 222