Nonlinear pricing schemes for agricultural cooperatives

被引:15
作者
Vercammen, J
Fulton, M
Hyde, C
机构
[1] UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA,FAC COMMERCE & BUSINESS ADM,VANCOUVER,BC V5Z 1M9,CANADA
[2] UNIV SASKATCHEWAN,DEPT AGR ECON,SASKATOON,SK S7N 0W0,CANADA
[3] UNIV SASKATCHEWAN,CTR STUDY COOPERAT,SASKATOON,SK S7N 0W0,CANADA
[4] UNIV MELBOURNE,DEPT ECON,PARKVILLE,VIC 3052,AUSTRALIA
关键词
agricultural cooperatives; asymmetric information; membership fees; nonlinear pricing;
D O I
10.2307/1243275
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Standard pricing practices are generally not efficient for a cooperative. Sexton (1986) suggests that membership fees/rebates can be used to facilitate efficient pricing, but such schemes may not be feasible because of membership heterogeneity and information asymmetries. In this paper a constrained efficient pricing rule for a cooperative is derived that explicitly addresses the heterogeneity and information constraints. The optimal rule generally entails nonlinear pricing which. for the case of a farm purchasing cooperative, entails a higher average price for higher delivery volumes. The constrained efficient rule is modified to distribute the benefits more evenly over the cooperative's membership.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 584
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], J AGR COOP
  • [2] BAUMOL W, 1972, AM ECON REV, V60, P265
  • [3] EQUITY AND EFFICIENCY IN PUBLIC SECTOR PRICING - OPTIMAL 2-PART TARIFF
    FELDSTEIN, MS
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1972, 86 (02) : 175 - 187
  • [4] Fudenberg D., 1992, GAME THEORY
  • [5] OPTIMAL NONUNIFORM PRICES
    GOLDMAN, MB
    LELAND, HE
    SIBLEY, DS
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1984, 51 (02) : 305 - 319
  • [6] KAHNEMAN D, 1986, AM ECON REV, V76, P728
  • [7] Kamien Morton I., 1981, Dynamic Optimization: The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control in Economics and Management
  • [8] Laffont J, 1990, EC UNCERTAINTY INFOR
  • [9] RABIN M, 1993, AM ECON REV, V83, P1281
  • [10] WELFARE CONSIDERATIONS OF NON-LINEAR PRICING
    ROBERTS, KWS
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1979, 89 (353) : 66 - 83