Benefits of Precision Farming Technologies for Mechanical Weed Control in Soybean and Sugar Beet-Comparison of Precision Hoeing with Conventional Mechanical Weed Control

被引:52
作者
Kunz, Christoph [1 ]
Weber, Jonas Felix [1 ]
Gerhards, Roland [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Phytomed, Dept Weed Sci, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2015年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
mechanical weed control; automatic steering systems; sensor technologies; integrated weed management; IMAGE-ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy5020130
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Weed infestations and associated yield losses require effective weed control measures in soybean and sugar beet. Besides chemical weed control, mechanical weeding plays an important role in integrated weed management systems. Field experiments were conducted at three locations for soybean in 2013 and 2014 and at four locations for sugar beet in 2014 to investigate if automatic steering technologies for inter-row weed hoeing using a camera or RTK- GNSS increase weed control efficacy, efficiency and crop yield. Treatments using precision farming technologies were compared with conventional weed control strategies. Weed densities in the experiments ranged from 15 to 154 plants m-2 with Chenopodium album, Polygonum convolvulus, Polygonum aviculare, Matricaria chamomilla and Lamium purpureum being the most abundant species. Weed hoeing using automatic steering technologies reduced weed densities in soybean by 89% and in sugar beet by 87% compared to 85% weed control efficacy in soybean and sugar beet with conventional weeding systems. Speed of weed hoeing could be increased from 4 km h- 1 with conventional hoes to 7 and 10 km center dot h- 1, when automatic steering systems were used. Precision hoeing technologies increased soybean yield by 23% and sugar beet yield by 37%. After conventional hoeing and harrowing, soybean yields were increased by 28% and sugar beet yield by 26%.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 142
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Reduced tillage and cover crops improve water capture and reduce erosion of fine textured soils in raised bed tomato systems [J].
Alliaume, F. ;
Rossing, W. A. H. ;
Tittonell, P. ;
Jorge, G. ;
Dogliotti, S. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 183 :127-137
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, LANG ENV STAT COMP
[3]   Absorption, translocation and metabolism of metamitron in Chenopodium album [J].
Aper, Jonas ;
Mechant, Els ;
Rubin, Baruch ;
Heyerick, Arne ;
Callebaut, Gert ;
Mangelinckx, Sven ;
Deforce, Dieter ;
De Kimpe, Norbert ;
Bulcke, Robert ;
Reheul, Dirk .
PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2012, 68 (02) :209-216
[4]  
Bastiaans L., 2003, Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences, P1494
[5]  
Bowman G., 1997, Steel in the Field: A Farmer'S Guide to Weed Management Tools
[6]   INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT-TECHNIQUES TO REDUCE HERBICIDE INPUTS IN SOYBEAN [J].
BUHLER, DD ;
GUNSOLUS, JL ;
RALSTON, DF .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1992, 84 (06) :973-978
[7]  
Cummert A., 2012, Journal fur Kulturpflanzen, V64, P105
[8]  
DIERAUER HU, 1994, UNKRAUTREGULIERUNG O
[9]   Practical experiences with a system for site-specific weed control in arable crops using real-time image analysis and GPS-controlled patch spraying [J].
Gerhards, R ;
Oebel, H .
WEED RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (03) :185-193
[10]  
GLATTKOWSKI H, 1993, ZUCKERINDUSTRIE, V118, P247